Samuel Stephens, Author at Fitstra

What is Muscle Hypertrophy?

Samuel Stephens — Fri, 10 Jan 2025 20:42:00 +0000

What is Muscle Hypertrophy?

Hypertrophy is the growth of a tissue due to the enlargement of its cells. Different tissues in the body can experience hypertrophy, so this term does not exclusively refer to muscle growth. A second term to know is hyperplasia, which is also the growth of a tissue, but hyperplasia is caused by an increase in cell number, not cell size. So to answer the original question, skeletal muscle hypertrophy is an increase in muscle size caused by an enlargement of muscle cells.

So if we don’t gain more muscle cells by lifting weights, what’s growing in the muscle cell to make it bigger? And what is a muscle cell? To answer these two questions, we need to learn just a little bit about muscle anatomy. If we know what our muscles are made of, we can better understand how and why they grow.

On the far right in the image below, we have the entire muscle belly and you see how the full muscle attaches to bone through the tendon. In the middle, we have a cross-sectional view that shows what’s inside the muscle. As you can see here, our muscles are made of fascicles that contain many muscle fibers. And it’s the muscle fiber that is the muscle cell. Each cell, or muscle fiber, consists of bundles of individual myofibril strands that are formed by a series of linked segments called sarcomeres. Inside every sarcomere is an interlaced arrangement of the contractile proteins actin and myosin. Muscle contractions occur when myosin binds to actin and slides the two structures past one another, drawing each end of the sarcomere closer to the middle of the segment.

When we lift weights or do any type of resistance training that causes muscle hypertrophy, our muscles can add new sarcomeres to the middle and/or the ends of myofibrils. This is called adding sarcomeres added in series. Sarcomeres can also be added in parallel when existing myofibril strands split lengthwise to form entirely new strands. But whether we’re adding sarcomeres in series or parallel, the growth of new physical structures is called myofibrillar hypertrophy. Myofibrillar hypertrophy occurs through a process called muscle protein synthesis, and it’s what drives our growth and training progress. The more sarcomeres we add through muscle protein synthesis, the greater our strength output and total muscle mass will be. However, sarcomeres gained through myofibrillar hypertrophy are not the only contributors to cell size.

We can also experience muscle hypertrophy through an increase in the size of the sarcoplasm of each muscle fiber. This is called sarcoplasmic hypertrophy. The sarcoplasm is the fluid, nutrient, and fuel-rich interior space of each muscle fiber and it surrounds all of the myofibrils within a cell. While our muscles can grow through sarcoplasmic hypertrophy and this adaptation does offer some great benefits like increased glycogen storage, it probably shouldn’t be the singular focus of our training. A well designed strength and hypertrophy program will inevitably induce sarcoplasm growth, but exclusively chasing the pump with a high-rep, high-damage routine may miss out on some of the myofibrillar hypertrophy caused by heavier weight and the mechanical tension it creates.

However, sarcoplasmic hypertrophy isn’t entirely useless. It’s possible that the expansion of the cell due to sarcoplasmic hypertrophy may help aid in the growth of future myofibrils. It is theorized that the expansion creates more “empty” volume in the muscle cell and that unused space makes it easier to add sarcomeres in parallel. Think of it as a path of least resistance type of thing. I’ve got that paper linked below if you’d like to read more.

This is a quick and easy post that just covers the basics of hypertrophy and muscle growth. If you’d like to check out some workout programs that help put theory into practice, head over to the Workout Programs page and have fun.

References

Roberts, M. D., Haun, C. T., Vann, C. G., Osburn, S. C., & Young, K. C. (2020). Sarcoplasmic Hypertrophy in Skeletal Muscle: A Scientific “Unicorn” or Resistance Training Adaptation?. Frontiers in physiology, 11, 816. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00816

The post What is Muscle Hypertrophy? appeared first on Fitstra.

3 Step Start – Weight Loss Program

Samuel Stephens — Mon, 06 Jan 2025 05:27:30 +0000

SIMPLE WEIGHT LOSS

Below is a simple weight loss program designed to help beginners get started.

This three step introduction to exercise and nutrition is intentionally easy because the end goal is habit formation. Consistency takes priority over intensity here. Stick to these simple steps for at least one month before moving on to more complicated programs.

1 Track Your Food

Download a calorie counting app (Lose It, Cronometer, MyFitnessPal) and track everything you consume for at least two weeks. All food and drinks.

Don’t change your diet during the first week. Instead, pay attention to your daily caloric totals and the macronutrient contents of your meals. Train your eyes to identify what’s on your plate and how much water you’re drinking per day. It’s easier to implement good dietary habits when we can reflect on bad ones.

Read this diet guide for more info.

2 Do Easy Cardio

Find a 1-2 mile loop in your neighborhood and travel it 3-4 times per week by walking and/or jogging it.

Slowly decrease your total time each week by jogging more and more of the distance. The walk versus jog structure is irrelevant. Cap your time for each session at ~40 minutes and keep your intensity level in the moderate range. Consistency is the most important thing here. I recommend you do this outside, but a treadmill is acceptable.

3 Add Resistance Training

Incorporate resistance training into your routine 2-3 times per week. Keep cardio days and resistance days separate. If steps one and two are initially overwhelming, add this step when you’re ready. But don’t leave it out.

Below is a simple and effective full body workout to help get you started. Complete 3-4 rounds of this circuit in sequence, resting as needed. Each exercise should be performed for 30-60 seconds before moving on to the next. The entire workout should take less than 30 minutes. The only piece of equipment you’ll need is a suspension trainer or a pair of gymnastic rings. One is required.

Check out the Beginner program for traditional strength training.

Warm Up	Full Body Circuit	Cool Down
Easy Cardio - 5 minutes	Squat (Bodyweight or Goblet)	Foam Rolling (Optional)
Dynamic Stretching	Row (Ring Row or Suspension)	Static Stretching
	Push Up (Standard or Modified)
	Plank (High or Low)
	Superman Hold

Next Steps?

Before moving on to more complicated programs, make sure the routine you’re following looks somewhat similar to the one below.

Monday	Tuesday	Wednesday	Thursday	Friday	Saturday	Sunday
Cardio	Resistance Training	Cardio	Resistance Training	Cardio	Rest	Rest

Regarding nutrition, build your meals around specific macronutrient portions and stick to a consistent eating schedule. I recommended the 4X4 strategy outlined in the nutrition chapter, but a variety of tactics can work. Dialing this in for your specific needs will take some trial and error. Be willing to experiment.

Cardiovascular conditioning can also be progressed in a number of different ways. If you’re focused on weight loss and the initial two mile strategy has been working for you, keep at it until your progress plateaus. An uninterrupted two mile jog is a great long-term goal here. If you’re looking for general cardiovascular fitness, all Fitstra resistance training programs include a variety of interval work as well as steady state times. Use these programs as they are or modify them to fit your needs. However you choose to implement cardio, be sure to keep it realistic and sustainable.

For resistance training, start the Fitstra Beginner program. Practice the included compound exercises with barbells, dumbbells, and your own bodyweight. Start with two days per week and maintain that frequency for at least a month, then advance to three. Keep running the Beginner program until you stop making strength gains. The Beginner program is covered in more detail below.

The post 3 Step Start – Weight Loss Program appeared first on Fitstra.

Legs Push Pull

Samuel Stephens — Mon, 06 Jan 2025 05:07:09 +0000

MORE PROGRAM DETAILS

For more information about program language, terms, and abreviations, download the full program PDF.

Legs Push Pull

A 6 day/wk, 15+ week weight training program designed to primarily target hypertrophy through an alternating legs/push/pull setup.

Optional Modifications

Want more upper back work and less traps? Swap out the shrugs for AMRAP(+) sets of suspension rows and emphasize scapular retraction when you pull.

For dips, do them instead of the DB bench press every other month. Keep sets and reps the same. For more vertical pressing, swap out DB incline presses for KB/DB overhead presses.

Bulgarian split squats can be substituted for BB Reverse Lunges. Do not eliminate Reverse Lunges completely.

Arm work labels are intentionally nonspecific. Pick your favorite arm exercises and have fun.

To work in calf raises, combine them with hamstring curls as a two piece circuit, starting with hamstring curls. If you don’t have a dedicated hamstring curl machine, do Nordic curls on a GHD or with a partner.

A 45 degree hip extension or GHD can be substituted for Superman. Maintain the time per set.

The post Legs Push Pull appeared first on Fitstra.

LPPLU

Samuel Stephens — Mon, 06 Jan 2025 05:00:24 +0000

MORE PROGRAM DETAILS

For more information about program language, terms, and abreviations, download the full program PDF.

LPPLU

A 5 day/wk, 10+ week weight training program designed to target strength and hypertrophy through a blended legs/push/pull/lower/upper routine.

Optional Modifications

Want more upper back work and less traps? Swap out the shrugs for AMRAP(+) sets of suspension rows and emphasize scapular retraction when you pull.

For dips, do them instead of the DB bench press every other month. Keep sets and reps the same. For more vertical pressing, swap out DB incline presses for KB/DB overhead presses.

Bulgarian split squats can be substituted for BB Reverse Lunges. Do not eliminate Reverse Lunges completely.

Arm work labels are intentionally nonspecific. Pick your favorite arm exercises and have fun.

A 45 degree hip extension or GHD can be substituted for Superman. Maintain the time per set.

The post LPPLU appeared first on Fitstra.

Full Body

Samuel Stephens — Mon, 06 Jan 2025 04:38:29 +0000

MORE PROGRAM DETAILS

For more information about program language, terms, and abreviations, download the full program PDF.

Full Body

A 2-3 day/wk, full body weight training program designed to improve strength and hypertrophy.

Overview

The Full Body is a continuation of the 2-3 day per week Beginner routine, but this program includes progressive overloading. It is designed to target strength and hypertrophy. If you’ve taken an appropriate amount of time to learn the basics, this will be an easy transition from the Beginner. If you enjoy a 2-3x/week schedule but want more variety, the Full Body is a great place to hang out.

Optional Modifications

For dips, do them instead of the DB bench press every other month. Keep sets and reps the same. Bulgarian split squats can be substituted for BB Reverse Lunges. Do not eliminate Reverse Lunges completely.

For extra arm work, split your biceps and triceps between two days (e.g. biceps on Monday and triceps on Wednesday), start with only one additional exercise, and follow the rep/set scheme listed for the last exercise of that day.

A 45 degree hip extension or GHD can be substituted for Superman. Maintain the time per set.

The post Full Body appeared first on Fitstra.

Upper Lower

Samuel Stephens — Mon, 06 Jan 2025 04:19:21 +0000

MORE PROGRAM DETAILS

For more information about program language, terms, and abreviations, download the full program PDF.

Upper Lower

A 4x/wk, 10+ week weight training program designed to target strength and hypertrophy through an upper body/lower body split.

Optional Modifications

If you’re limited on time, reduce the set count to three for all exercises.

For dips, do them instead of the DB bench press every other month. Keep sets and reps the same.

Bulgarian split squats can be substituted for BB Reverse Lunges. Do not eliminate Reverse Lunges completely.

For extra arm work, split your biceps and triceps between the two upper body days (e.g. biceps on Tuesday and triceps on Friday), start with only one additional exercise, and follow the rep/set scheme listed for the last exercise of that day.

A 45 degree hip extension or GHD can be substituted for Superman. Maintain the time per set.

The post Upper Lower appeared first on Fitstra.

Nutrition: Fueling for Fitness

Samuel Stephens — Fri, 03 Jan 2025 21:49:39 +0000

Get the Full Book

This guide is one chapter from Fitness & Nutrition Programming for Beginners. If you enjoy reading it, consider purchasing the full book either as a PDF or paperback. Thanks!

Nutrition: Fueling for Fitness

How nutrition habits affect exercise performance and research-based dietary strategies to help maximize muscle growth, efficiently lose fat, and get the most out of your workouts.

Hunger Gains

If you were to pick up a skill-based hobby at a young age and practice it multiple times a day for the rest of your life, you’d get pretty good at it. You’d learn all of the secrets that take years to discover and even longer to master. Practice makes perfect and you’d have no shortage of that.

Our dietary habits are quite a bit different. We eat every day, yet most of us have little to no understanding of our nutritional needs. Instead, we rely primarily on taste and satiation for food choices. Without a solid grasp on the very basics of nutrition, every aspect of our exercise progress can be negatively impacted. Luckily, eating is a skill that we can excel at with practice.

This chapter covers basic macronutrient information, includes a simple dietary strategy for general exercise success, discusses how to maximize muscle growth through diet, provides a sustainable fat loss diet, and is written to help anyone better understand the relationship between food and fitness.

There’s a lot to cover. Let’s dig in.

My Educational Limitations & RDs

As a personal trainer, I believe my primary teaching focus should be placed on program development and the mechanics of exercise. General fitness stuff. Because I prioritize movement over food, my dietary knowledge is limited compared to highly qualified nutrition professionals. I know more about a performance-based diet than some but less than others. The science of exercise and nutrition are both so fascinating, complex, and ever-evolving that an attempt to master both would be a bit ridiculous.

I believe this chapter will be informative and a helpful resource for many, but I’m not a nutrition expert.

To get the most out of your diet and reach your performance potential, work with a registered dietitian (RD). A registered dietitian will help you design a solid nutrition plan that’s custom built for your individual goals, genetics, and lifestyle preferences. A great RD is an invaluable asset to your fitness education. We’ll dive into some of the services RDs offer and how they can drastically impact your training performance later in this chapter.

Energy Intake, Expenditure, & Balance

The foods we eat and their macronutrient contents shape our bodies in specific ways, directly contribute to our fitness capabilities, and have noticeable effects on our overall health. To achieve our goals, we need to eat the right foods in the correct quantities at the best times. But before we discuss the details of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins, it’s important to take a step back from food and cover the basics of weight loss, weight gain, and weight maintenance.

The graphic below illustrates energy balance (EB). Energy balance occurs when total daily caloric intake equals total daily caloric expenditure. EB is weight maintenance and our reference point for all future changes in weight.

Modifications to this equilibrium will result in corresponding changes in body mass. Weight loss occurs when energy expenditure exceeds intake (burn more than we eat), while weight gain is the result of intake outpacing expenditure (eat more than we burn). To specifically gain muscle mass or lose body fat, it’s important to have a deeper understanding of energy expenditure. Changes in body composition rely on a more complex strategy than calories in versus calories out.

Our bodies are sophisticated, high performance, organic machines that require a constant supply of fuel to operate. Regardless of the fuel source used (food versus stored body mass), the total amount of energy we burn per day is our total daily energy expenditure (TDEE). TDEE is measured in calories. A calorie (Calorie or kcal) is a unit of energy used to measure the thermogenic potential of food, or how much energy a particular substance provides per gram. There’s not a special calorie molecule in our foods. It’s a metric we use to measure energy density and energy expenditure.

Differences in height, weight, eating habits, exercise routines, and metabolism result in significantly different TDEEs from person to person. For example, an elite cyclist will have a much higher TDEE than someone who is sedentary. Metabolic testing is the only way to accurately determine your TDEE, but it can be estimated with some simple metrics. An online search for “TDEE calculator” will give you great options.

Take a moment and estimate your TDEE right now.

Despite differences in total expenditure, we generally all burn calories for the same reasons. Our total daily fuel consumption can be broken down into three basic categories. These are basal metabolic rate, thermic effect of activity, and the thermic effect of feeding.

The first component of TDEE is basal metabolic rate (BMR). BMR is a measurement of the minimum amount of energy used to power essential bodily functions when we’re at rest. Brain activity, metabolism, body heat homeostasis, respiration, blood circulation, and many other autonomic internal processes require fuel to operate. Basal metabolic rates vary from person to person due to physiological differences, but this baseline idle fuel consumption accounts for 60-80% of daily energy burned by most people. BMR is a major factor to consider when attempting to change body composition because it can be manipulated to our advantage.

The thermic effect of activity (TEA) is next. As the name implies, TEA is a measurement of all energy expended during movement. Walking the dog, chopping up vegetables for dinner, running, lifting weights, fidgeting your leg while sitting at work, etc. If you’re moving in some way, you’re using energy to fuel activity. The bulk of TEA will be from exercise for most fitness enthusiasts.

BMR and TEA are largely dependent on body size, weight, and composition. For example, a 6’5” 275 lb person will have a higher BMR than someone who is 5’2” and 120 lbs. Taller and heavier people burn more calories per minute than their shorter and lighter peers, but neither BMR or TEA are permanent. As we gain or lose weight, BMR and TEA change and our intake will need to be modified accordingly.

The thermic effect of feeding (TEF) is the last part of TDEE. The thermic effect of feeding is a measurement of the energy cost required to digest different macronutrients. For most people, TEF is roughly equal to 10% of their total daily energy expenditure. The foods we eat need to be broken down into their smaller subcomponents before they can be used by the body, and these catabolic (breakdown of a substance) reactions require different amounts of energy depending on the macronutrient being metabolized. The following percentages are estimated digestive energy requirements for each macronutrient, relative to their caloric values –

0-3% for fats
5-10% for carbohydrates
20-30% for proteins

For example, if you eat a 500 calorie meal of pure protein, 20-30% (100-150 calories) of the calories contained in that meal will be burned to metabolize it. This high energy cost of protein metabolism makes it a very useful tool for weight loss and an important factor to consider when trying to gain weight.

TDEEs are calorically expensive and daily energy demands can vary drastically from person to person, so it’s critical that energy intake (EI) reflects our goals and fuel requirements. We need to ensure our diets consist of the right foods and that these foods are consumed in ideal quantities. If we understand how carbohydrates, fats, and proteins affect our fitness progress, we can easily build the muscle we want and drop the pounds we don’t.

But before diving into food, let’s discuss macronutrients. What are carbohydrates, proteins, and fats?

Carbohydrates - Overview

Despite the popular trend of carbohydrate slandering in many health and fitness social circles, this macronutrient is an essential component of a balanced diet. The terms starch, carb, and sugar are often villainized as weight gaining, health destroying substances, but our bodies can’t reach peak performance without them. If you’re serious about your fitness goals, you need carbohydrates.

This section covers the very basics of carbohydrate structure, digestion, storage, and its effect on exercise.

Carbohydrates are abundant in most diets, provide roughly four calories of energy per gram, and are one of the body’s primary sources of fuel. Carbohydrates consist of various numbers of individually linked sugar molecules (saccharides) that are made of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Carbohydrates range in saccharide complexity depending on how many sugar molecules are linked together.

As shown above, a simple monosaccharide consists of a single sugar molecule, disaccharides contain two, oligosaccharides range from 3-10, and polysaccharides can be formed by hundreds or thousands. Some carbohydrate sources like high-fructose corn syrup should probably be limited, but others are necessary. For example, cellulose is a non-digestible polysaccharide found in plants that can improve gut microbiome health, digestive regularity, and is an important component to any diet. Eat your fibrous vegetables and prebiotics.

Despite wide ranges in sugar structure complexity, our digestive system eventually breaks down all carbohydrates into the same monosaccharides through enzymatic and chemical reactions. These catabolic processes allow glucose to diffuse through intestinal cell walls and enter our bloodstream. However, some carbohydrate sources are digested and disassembled into glucose more rapidly than others. This results in significantly different rates of blood sugar elevation and energy availability. Complex carbs are typically thought to be better than their mono and disaccharide counterparts due to superior blood sugar regulation, but blood glucose levels don’t always scale proportionately with saccharide complexity. Meaning, both simple and complex carbs can cause similar blood sugar responses.

To maximize exercise performance and efficiently change body composition, our carbohydrate selection process should factor in saccharide digestion speeds and how they affect blood sugar levels. But because we can’t rely exclusively on mono/di/polysaccharide labels to predict carbohydrate metabolism rates, we need to learn about the glycemic index.

The glycemic index (GI) is a measurement of how quickly and to what degree specific foods raise blood sugar relative to a pure glucose control test. Using a 100 point scale, high GI foods are scored at or above 70, moderate ranges from 56-69, and the low end is less than or equal to 55. As shown in the graph above, high GI foods quickly spike blood sugar levels before rapidly declining, while low GI foods slowly ramp up and sustain moderate concentrations for longer.

Some popular carbohydrate examples and their GI scores are listed in the table above. Notice how glycemic index values vary across all saccharide complexities and food types. For example, watermelon (76) and apple (36) are both fruits on the simple side of the carbohydrate spectrum, yet their GI scores are very different. The same disparity is also seen in complex carbs like boiled potatoes (78) and whole wheat spaghetti (48).

Significant differences between glycemic responses can make the process of carbohydrate selection feel overwhelming, but this enormous amount of nutrient variety is actually quite useful. A high number of saccharide options, each with their own slightly unique digestive properties, give us more control over our blood sugar levels and all subsequent physiological responses. By consuming the right quantity and quality of carbs at specific times, we can significantly increase muscle growth, improve fat loss efficiency, and maximize energy storage to help fuel future workouts. Strategic carbohydrate ingestion allows us to manipulate insulin, one of our most potent anabolic hormones.

Insulin is responsible for a wide range of growth responses. This section’s main focus is carbohydrate storage.

When dietary carbohydrates are disassembled into their monosaccharide components through digestion, glucose enters our bloodstream. In response to elevated blood glucose levels, beta cells in our pancreas secrete insulin and this peptide hormone instructs our muscles and fat cells to absorb nutrients. Glucose molecules that are not immediately consumed as energy are absorbed by the body and transported into short-term storage locations for future use. Unlike free fatty acids or amino acids, our bodies don’t have a way to store large amounts of carbohydrates for extended periods of time, but we can briefly store smaller amounts (1-2 lbs) as glycogen.

Through a process called glycogenesis that occurs in the muscles and liver, our bodies can synthesize their own polysaccharides. This homegrown, complex carbohydrate that’s unique to humans and animals is called glycogen. Once formed, glycogen is stored in the liver and muscles so that it can be used as an immediately available, local fuel source for moderate to high-intensity exercise. With carbohydrate deposits spread all throughout the body ready to assist in strenuous muscular contractions and high levels of force production, the metabolic pathway of anaerobic glycolysis can quickly turn this stored fuel into spent fuel. Glycogen is one of the fuel sources that allows us to consistently apply a high level of intensity to our workouts.

As discussed in the Strength & Hypertrophy chapter, we cumulatively recruit more motor units in an ascending order of size until all fibers in a single muscle are active. Under demanding conditions, type 2 fibers rely primarily on anaerobic glycolysis (carbohydrate metabolism without oxygen) to achieve their maximum output potential. And with adequate glycogen stores, these fibers allow us to lift more weight, produce more consistent force, and generally perform our best in most fitness environments. Conversely, exercise intensity can suffer without sufficient carbohydrate consumption to saturate glycogen stores and fuel fast-twitch, hypertrophy-prone fibers. Studies show that high-intensity exercise performance can drop off significantly when dietary carbohydrates are restricted. This means low-carbohydrate diets can drastically impact muscle growth and anaerobic output.

Glycogen can also help regulate resting blood sugar levels outside of exercise environments. These polysaccharide stores provide a steady supply of carbohydrates to fuel glucose-dependent brain activity, reduce fluctuations in testosterone, assist in hydration (2-3 grams of water are stored per gram of glycogen), and help prevent hypoglycemia.

Pretty sweet.

Carbohydrates help us perform at high levels and reach our anabolic potential, but their absence can be equally beneficial in certain situations. We can speed up fat loss progress and improve endurance exercise performance by systematically restricting carbohydrate intake and pairing that macronutrient deficit with carefully programmed cardiovascular exercise. We’ll dive into that later.

To get the most out of resistance training and anaerobic conditioning, we need to utilize dietary carbohydrates as a primary fuel source. Carbs allow us to consistently work hard and push our bodies to the edge of their limits. However, brutal workouts can take a very real toll on us if we don’t recover properly between sessions. To address this, let’s shift gears and talk about a different macronutrient that plays a vital role in post-workout recovery and muscle growth.

What is protein and how does it affect exercise performance?

Protein - Overview

Unlike carbohydrates, there’s little debate regarding the necessity of protein. We can’t be healthy without it. Neurotransmitter production, DNA replication, blood cell formation, tissue repair, and many other processes rely on protein. Dietary protein is required for muscle growth and aids in strength development, which are two attributes that can improve our quality of life as we age. To build muscle, recover from demanding workouts, and sustain a multitude of essential bodily functions, we need this macronutrient.

This section covers the basics of protein structure, quality, and the relationship between protein intake and muscle growth.

Protein provides about four calories of energy per gram, but these calories are not typically a source of fuel. Instead, this valuable macronutrient functions as a multi-purpose building material used to construct enzymes, hormones, bones, muscles, and nearly everything in between. Proteins contribute to the formation of many different compounds and tissues due to the versatility of their subcomponents, which are mainly composed of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen. The super adaptable building blocks that link together and form whole proteins are called amino acids (AA).

There are hundreds of different amino acids found throughout nature, but only 20 are used in the human body and consumed in our diet. These 20 standard AAs are categorized as either essential amino acids (EAA) or non-essential amino acids (NEAA). Essential amino acids cannot be synthesized by the body without sacrificing existing muscle tissue and must be acquired from the foods we eat. Muscle protein breakdown is how the body produces EAAs. Nonessential amino acids can be synthesized under normal conditions and are not required to be present in our diet.

Out of the nine EAAs, three of them are unique and play critical roles in the development of muscle tissue. Leucine, isoleucine, and valine are branched chain amino acids (BCAAs). All three BCAAs are required for tissue growth but leucine has the greatest effect on muscle protein synthesis.

While many different amino acids are used to form new proteins, leucine is the main catalyst for MPS. The presence of leucine in our blood is primarily what instructs muscles to initiate the process of MPS. Some studies have shown that only 10 grams of BCAAs (with a high leucine content) can activate MPS to the same degree as a whole protein meal. Because muscle growth is so dependent on leucine, a chronic deficiency of this EAA can result in decreased muscle mass, minimal strength development, longer recovery times, and generally poor performance across a wide range of physical activities. Luckily, these undesirable side effects can be prevented by consuming a diet rich in high-quality proteins.

All dietary proteins contain a mixture of essential and nonessential amino acids, but specific AA concentrations vary widely from food to food. These discrepancies make some protein sources better than others. With so many different protein options to choose from, it’s important to have a basic understanding of essential amino acid availability. This can help us make informed dietary decisions regarding protein intake, which can lead to better overall fitness progress and improved general health. To make the best choices, we need to know the difference between complete and incomplete proteins.

Proteins are classified as complete or incomplete depending on their EAA profiles. Incomplete proteins do not contain all nine essential amino acids. Most plant-based proteins are incomplete, but there are some exceptions like soy and hemp. In contrast, complete proteins do provide all nine EAAs, usually in high quantities. All animal proteins are complete proteins. Because of this pretty consistent quality difference between plant and animal sources, the easiest way to consume adequate amounts of EAAs is to simply include animal products in our diets. When paired with plant-based fats and carbohydrates, animal proteins eliminate amino acid availability concerns and allow us to focus on flavor, meal variety, and other enjoyable aspects of eating.

Plant proteins may be incomplete on their own, but we can create complete plant-based meals by combining multiple incomplete plant sources. The pairing of rice and beans is a popular example of this strategy. As standalone plant protein sources, neither rice nor beans contain all nine essential amino acids. But where one is lacking, the other is sufficient. These complementary amino acid profiles work together to fill in the nutrient gaps that would normally be present if either food was consumed alone. If your nutrition goals are primarily focused on general health, this mix-and-match tactic can make plant-based proteins fantastic alternatives to traditional animal sources. But if you’re trying to maximize muscle growth and exercise performance, excluding all animal products from your diet can put you at a significant disadvantage compared to your meat-eating peers.

In addition to being complete proteins, animal products also possess higher EAA and BCAA concentrations than their plant-based counterparts. Even complete plant protein sources like soy and hemp don’t have the same EAA content of whey when measured gram-for-gram. Plant proteins just can’t compete with the leucine content found in animal sources when consumed in equal quantities. However, these issues inherent to plant proteins can be resolved by eating slightly more plant protein per meal or by supplementing with protein shakes and BCAA supplements. Animal sources have the initial advantage, but the playing field can be leveled if we know how to address it properly.

The big question is, which is best? Animal proteins allow us to be more efficient with meal prep and are more nutritionally dense, but both options can work. If you’re OK with consuming animals and animal-based supplements, eat them. They’re delicious, nutritious, and contain the EAA content needed for muscle growth. Animal products make meeting amino acid requirements easy because they’re so rich in BCAAs/leucine. However, if meat isn’t on your menu, no problem. But be sure to address the potential deficiencies associated with plant sources. Adequate amounts of all nine essential amino acids are necessary to maximize muscle protein synthesis potential regardless of where you fall on the flora versus fauna protein intake debate.

Now that we know a bit more about protein, let’s dive into the relationship between diet and MPS. How does dietary protein make us better in the gym?

After eating a nutrient rich meal full of essential amino acids, various digestive enzymes and chemical reactions work together to break down whole proteins into smaller polypeptide chains. These di and tripeptides are then separated into individual amino acids as they diffuse through intestinal walls and enter the bloodstream. Similar to the intake response of carbohydrates, circulating levels of amino acids stimulate the release of insulin, which assists with nutrient absorption. And just like glucose, amino acids are sent to the liver and taken up by our muscles.

When AAs enter our muscles, high blood concentrations of leucine are detected and the MPS alarm is triggered. Under non-exercising conditions, muscle protein synthesis rates peak at levels that primarily aim to combat the normal breakdown of muscle tissue. Depending on our diet and activity levels, synthesis and breakdown could be in equilibrium, but it’s more likely that breakdown just barely exceeds MPS. This results in a slow loss of muscle tissue each year. If you’ve taken extended time off from lifting, you’ve experienced these vanishing gains firsthand.

A gradual decline in lean body mass due to a sedentary lifestyle can negatively impact our quality of life. This issue is evident to an unfortunately high degree in elderly populations. Without resistance training or adequate protein intake, muscle mass will disappear along with functional mobility for everyday tasks. Fortunately, this problem is resolved relatively easily with the application of exercise and a protein-rich diet.

As discussed in the strength and hypertrophy chapter, both resistance exercise and cardiovascular conditioning drastically increase protein synthesis rates, leading to significant muscle growth. Protein synthesis rates can jump 200% above their normal levels when we add intense physical activity to our routines. This subsequent boost to MPS will prioritize muscle growth (myofibrillar protein synthesis) if our workouts are more focused on lifting weights, while a cardio emphasis can increase our aerobic efficiency and fat burning capabilities (mitochondrial protein synthesis). And if our programming includes both resistance training and cardiovascular conditioning, we get to simultaneously enjoy more muscle mass, better strength output, improved cardiovascular endurance, and a leaner physique.

Whatever our fitness goals are, we need strong and well developed muscles to be our best. A protein-rich diet helps us build the tissue we want.

With carbohydrates and proteins covered, let’s move on to the last macronutrient.

Fats - Overview

Fat used to be a pretty bad word in dietary conversations. It was associated with clogged arteries, obesity, and excessive indulgence. You only live once, so use real butter. Fortunately, newer research has changed society’s opinion of this essential macronutrient. Advancements in nutritional sciences have helped us further understand the role dietary fats play in cognitive function and development, hormone production, lipid soluble nutrient transport, energy availability, and many other vital bodily functions. Fat is important for our health and an amazing energy source to fuel our workouts.

In this section, we’ll cover the basics of dietary fats, fat metabolism, fat storage, and how lipids can improve exercise performance.

Fats primarily consist of carbon and hydrogen, are the most energy dense macronutrient at nine calories per gram, and are our primary fuel source for low to moderate-intensity activity. If you’re reading this while seated at your desk, you’re probably using fat for the majority of your energy. Dietary fats exist in a few different forms that vary in structure and function depending on molecular composition, just like carbohydrates and proteins. The three primary types of lipids we consume in our diet are cholesterol, phospholipids, and triglycerides. Triglycerides are the main fat focus of this section, but it’s important to briefly cover cholesterol and phospholipids.

Cholesterol is a type of steroid produced by all animal cells and found in most animal products. Although cholesterol is contained in the foods we eat, blood cholesterol levels are mainly regulated internally and synthesized by the liver, not directly due to diet. Diet influences overall health and overall health affects blood cholesterol. This lipid is used for many different purposes in the body, but its main exercise performance contributions are hormone production and food digestion.

Our anabolic potential is largely dependent on cholesterol availability because cholesterol is a precursor to so many hormones (testosterone, estrogen, DHEA, etc). Cholesterol is also used to synthesize bile salts which help with the digestion and emulsification of fats, allowing us to absorb this energy-rich macronutrient more efficiently.

Recent studies have changed long-held beliefs of cholesterol and given us a better understanding of its role in the body. Dietary cholesterol is no longer the primary suspect in the development of cardiovascular disease. Too much of anything can be harmful, but when our fat intake composition follows certain healthy guidelines (reduced saturated fat intake and no trans fat), dietary cholesterol isn’t something to stress about. A diet rich in good fats can help keep our blood cholesterol levels in check and provide us with the fatty acids needed to maintain healthy hormones.

Phospholipids contribute to cell structure, function, and nutrient transport. Because we’re ultimately just a conscious collection of cells, overall cell health is pretty important. Our bodies synthesize the majority of all phospholipids needed for cellular function, but some studies suggest that phospholipid supplementation can have beneficial effects on tissue inflammation, cancer, cardiovascular disease, cognitive ability, and immune function. By consuming phospholipids and certain helpful fatty acids, cell membrane compositions can be remodeled, leading to greater levels of membrane plasticity and better overall cellular performance.

Cholesterol and phospholipids are present in the foods we eat and essential for certain bodily functions like hormone production and cell membrane integrity. However, our diets contain relatively small amounts of these two lipid forms compared to triglycerides.

A triglyceride (TG) is a fat compound made of glycerol bound to three fatty acids (FA). Nearly all of the fats in the foods we eat and those that are stored in our bodies are triglycerides. Depending on the structure of the fatty acid chains, triglycerides are categorized as either saturated or unsaturated.

As seen in the image above, saturated fats have neatly aligned FA chains and unsaturated FA chains look messy in comparison. The bends in the fatty acid chains of unsaturated fats are caused by double carbon bonds within the lipid structure. Unsaturated fats that contain one double bond are called monounsaturated fats, and those with more than one double carbon bond are polyunsaturated. For every double carbon bond, one molecule of hydrogen is removed from the FA chain, making unsaturated fats less full of hydrogen than they potentially could be. Saturated fats don’t contain any double bonds in their fatty acid structure and have carbon-hydrogen bonds at every molecular junction along the chain, resulting in a 100% hydrogen saturation of the fatty acid chain.

Because saturated fats lack double bounds and are uniform in shape, the triglycerides in them can pack together tightly and form solid fat substances, like butter. In contrast, the bent tails of unsaturated fatty acids prevent these TGs from neatly aligning with one another and usually result in fats that are liquid at room temperature, like olive oil. This difference in triglyceride structure is one of the factors that can make certain fats healthier than others.

Some newer studies have challenged the link between saturated fats and heart disease, but the majority of current research still strongly supports the idea that saturated fat consumption should be limited. The generally accepted position held by many different health organizations and medical professionals places saturated fat intake at ~10% or less of total daily dietary fat. Due to these upper limit recommendations, our fat intake should consist primarily of poly and monounsaturated fats.

Monounsaturated fats are associated with a wide range of health benefits, and they should be included in our diets. However, we can synthesize all of the monounsaturated fatty acids needed for normal, healthy bodily function. Because of this internal production capability, there’s not an intake requirement for monounsaturated FAs. Flavor and basic caloric needs can drive consumption. Polyunsaturated FAs are a little different. Our bodies are unable to synthesize linoleic acid (an omega-6 FA) and alpha-linoleic acid (an omega-3 FA). These two important FAs are called essential fatty acids and must come from our diet.

Similar to how important the amino acid leucine is for protein synthesis, omega-3 fatty acids like alpha-linoleic acid can drastically improve our health when regularly consumed. The three omega-3 fatty acids used in the body are alpha-linoleic acid (ALA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). Our bodies can synthesize DHA and EPA from ALA, but the conversion rates are so low that additional supplementation is usually recommended. Fish oil with high DHA:EPA ratios (2:1) is an omega-3 supplement that can help solve this problem.

When polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids are plentiful in our diets, we can benefit from –

Increased cognitive function
Decreased depression
Increased synaptic plasticity
Increased neuroendocrine function
Increased memory in aging adults
Increased child brain development
Improved vision/retinal development
Increased nutrient absorption
Decreased cellular inflammation
Increased bone health
Increased muscular recovery
Increased immune function

Omega-3 fatty acids also indirectly improve exercise performance because they can help reduce cellular inflammation.

Inflammation is an immune system response to damage, stress, and/or disease that results in localized swelling. If you ever sprained an ankle or suffered an injury that resulted in a bruise, you’ve experienced inflammation. It’s pretty easy to understand how the inflammation of a sprained ankle can limit our mobility. We can clearly see and feel that we’re impaired to some degree. However, many other forms of inflammation are subtle and can become chronic exercise performance issues if ignored and allowed to persist. Nearly all of our cells are susceptible to the side effects of inflammation, but we want to avoid it most in those that are responsible for digestion and cognition.

Whether external stressors from work, a suboptimal diet (food sensitivities, allergens, etc.), or other environmental factors are to blame, central nervous system and digestive tract inflammation can negatively affect almost every aspect of life. Although our minds and stomachs are responsible for very different bodily functions, they’re a linked system called the gut-brain axis. The gut-brain axis is collectively responsible for the synthesis of many different essential compounds (neurotransmitters, hormones, enzymes, and proteins), the absorption of food needed for energy and muscle growth, the strength of our immune system, our emotional health, and all baseline cognitive abilities. While only a two organ system, the gut-brain axis controls our quality of life. If this system is impaired, so are we.

Fortunately, an adequate intake of omega-3 fatty acids (specifically DHA) can help reduce whole body inflammation. Like ice on a swollen joint, the anti-inflammatory properties of this super useful fatty acid can help eliminate cellular swelling and return organs/systems back to peak productivity. A diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids (less than 4:1 ratio of omega-6 to omega-3) can help us think clearly, fully utilize the foods we eat, and recover from intense workouts.

From hormone production to brain function, cardiovascular disease prevention to inflammation reduction, dietary fats are absolutely essential for optimal health. By consuming the right fats in the correct quantities, we’ll generally be better at life. Fats indirectly improve our exercise performance in a variety of ways, but they’re also an amazing source of energy.

How do dietary fats directly improve exercise performance?

After being ingested, dietary fats work their way through a lengthy lipid digestion process. Through different forms of triglyceride breakdown, free fatty acid transport, lipoprotein and cholesterol synthesis, and triglyceride reconstitution, most of the fats we consume eventually work their way into our fat cells as triglycerides for long-term energy storage.

Low to moderate intensity exercise primarily oxidizes fat through aerobic energy pathways. As we increase workout intensity, we shift from fat oxidation to anaerobic glycolysis and start metabolizing glucose for energy. Put simply, we burn more sugar and less fat the harder we work during cardiovascular exercise. This means our ability to use dietary and stored fats can significantly impact our performance in endurance-based activities. For many distance competitors, increased dietary fat consumption can result in more sustained energy at steady state heart rate ranges, decreased lactate production, and an overall improvement in pace time. We’ll dive more into fats and cardio later.

From brain health to endurance exercise performance, fats make us better at life.

With macronutrient basics covered, it’s time to shift the discussion from education to application. Building muscle, losing fat, and fueling peak exercise performance all depend on diet quality and consistency. So, let’s cover a diet that’s easy to understand and implement.

Meal Timing, Macronutrient Intake Quantities, & Food Sources

We can’t all follow the same diet and expect identical results. Total daily calories and meal compositions need to reflect our individual goals, lifestyles, and genetic differences. Effective nutrition plans must be tailored to the specific needs of the user, and this custom approach inevitably results in a wide range of dietary variation from person to person. Luckily, all good diets share a common outline that’s healthy, sustainable, and simple.

This section covers a realistic meal frequency strategy, how to estimate total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), recommended ranges of macronutrient intake quantities, and some whole food sources of carbohydrates, protein, and fats.

To start things off, let’s talk about meal timing.

While it might not seem like the most important factor to fitness success, eating frequency matters. The timing of carbohydrate and protein rich meals can affect energy availability, muscle growth, recovery, weight loss progress, and the regulation of many internal functions. An easy to follow eating schedule also gives our diet consistency and predictability, allowing new routines to become habits. By eating at predetermined times, rather than impulsively and in response to hunger, long-term diet adherence is easier and general program satisfaction is higher.

I recommend most people consume four meals per day, each separated by four hours. This results in 12 hours of feeding and 12 hours of fasting daily. Some example schedules are listed below. This suggested routine can fit into nearly any schedule as it essentially breaks down into a breakfast/lunch/snack/dinner split. At least three of these meals should come from whole food sources, not shakes or bars.

Our four empty plates are ready to go. How much food should each contain?

As covered earlier, our total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) represents all of the calories we burn per day, while energy intake (EI) is the total number of daily calories we consume. Calories in versus calories out is ultimately what determines changes in weight, so our total daily intake should reflect our daily expenditure. This means that before we can discuss which foods help us gain muscle or lose fat, we need to calculate TDEE and establish energy balance.

Total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) can be estimated in two easy steps.

Keep a detailed record of your normal diet for at least one week by using a free calorie tracking app (Lose It, Cronometer, MyFitnessPal, etc) and reading food labels. During this seven day period, refrain from making major changes to your diet. Record absolutely everything you put in your body. At the end of each day, look back over your eating habits and take note of the caloric totals along with the macronutrient contents of each meal. Are you eating more or less than you thought? Are certain macronutrients dominating your diet while others are nearly absent? This number can help explain any recent changes in body composition and/or energy levels.
Estimate your total daily expenditure by using a simple online TDEE calculator. For the most accurate number, have your body fat percentage measured at a local gym or university. How does your estimated TDEE compare to the seven day tracking average? If this calculated TDEE is lower than your tracked intake average and weight gain is an issue for you, this difference could explain the problem. If you have a pedometer, use it. Keep track of your step count throughout the day and use this activity data to help form your TDEE estimation.

By combining these two data points with what you intuitively know about your dietary needs and the way your body responds to certain meal sizes, you should be able to narrow down your TDEE to a reasonably narrow intake window that can be further refined over time. It will require a little experimentation to dial in energy balance intake correctly, but this discovery process shouldn’t take too long if you pay attention to what you eat and how those dietary habits make you look and feel. It’s important to note that neither one of these two TDEE calculation methods are perfectly accurate on their own. They’re only estimations. If your gym offers metabolic testing and can provide you with an accurate assessment of your BMR, take advantage of it. The more information you can gather, the better.

Now that we know how to calculate our intake requirements for energy balance, let’s discuss the composition of those calories from a macronutrient perspective. The table on the next page contains my recommended intake ranges for each macronutrient. 2000 and 2500 total daily calorie versions are listed as examples. These examples illustrate how caloric totals affect macronutrient quantities, both on a per day and per meal basis.

As seen above, each macronutrient is associated with a recommended intake range. 25-40% of the 2000 calorie daily total should come from protein, 20-45% from carbohydrates, and 20-50% from fat. Notice that none of these ranges include a 0% intake option. All three macros should be present in significant quantities. A 30% protein, 35% carbohydrate, and 35% fat split is my recommended starting point if you have no idea where to begin. However, there are many different viable macronutrient intake combination possibilities, so feel free to experiment with your meal compositions to find what works best for you.

These caloric percentages can be converted into grams of food to make meal preparation and tracking easier. The gram (g) is our unit of measurement for macronutrient intake quantities. Let’s use the low end of protein intake (25%) as an example of this conversion process.

25% of 2000 calories is 500 calories (2000 x 0.25 = 500) of protein. Those 500 total daily protein calories are then divided by 4 kcal/g (energy density of protein) to determine their weight in grams. 500 calories divided by 4 kcal/g equals 125g of protein per day. We then divide 125g of protein by four to evenly distribute daily protein content across each of our four meals. 125g of total daily protein divided by four meals equals roughly 30g of protein per meal.

This conversion process can be used to calculate the intake quantities of all three macronutrients. Be sure to remember the specific energy densities of protein (4 kcal/g), carbohydrates (4 kcal/g), and fat (9 kcal/g) when converting units.

If you enjoy maximizing exercise performance and tracking fitness progress, you’ll likely find the process of macronutrient intake experimentation enjoyable. Discovering your unique meal composition sweet spot is a satisfying feeling. However, if a majority of the content in this chapter is new to you and the subject of nutrition is a relatively foreign topic, it’s not necessary to obsess over the intake information listed above.

Food should be fun and a source of joy during preparation and consumption. If we fixate on the macronutrient percentages of everything we eat, we’ll inevitably develop an unhealthy relationship with food. Use my suggested intake ranges and your newly acquired calories-to-grams conversion skills to help shape your diet, but don’t let either of these things control you. Try to be aware of what you eat, do your best to make smart choices, and keep working towards your goals. Aim for structure and consistency, not perfection.

To help make smart choices a bit easier, the table on the next page contains some foods from each macronutrient category. Vegetable/fiber sources are included. This is not a comprehensive list of suggested foods to eat.

Notice that most foods listed contain a mixed macronutrient profile and only a handful of items consist solely of protein, carbohydrates, or fat. It’s important to be mindful of nutrient composition differences as you plan out your meals.

For example, 100g of chickpeas contain 6g of fat, 61g of carbohydrates, and 19g of protein. Chickpeas are a great source of protein but this food’s nutrient profile can lead to excessive carbohydrate intake if that particular macronutrient is not accounted for. Most foods also vary widely in the composition of their macronutrient subcomponents. Almonds and walnuts both are great sources of fat, but they contain very different levels of mono and polyunsaturated fats. Use your tracking app and read food labels to know what you’re eating.

Along with protein, carbohydrates, and fats, the table also includes a list of non-starchy and leafy green vegetables. I recommend that 1-2 of your daily meals include healthy portion sizes of items from that list. A fiber-rich vegetable source at lunch and at dinner easily accomplishes this. Track these foods.

With so many different foods to choose from and macronutrient intake ranges to work with, there are endless combination possibilities for your diet. If you’re feeling a little overwhelmed by the thought of using the information in this section to completely restructure your diet, that’s normal. It’s a lot to take in. Limitless variety is great for some, but it can be mentally paralyzing for others. Most lifestyle changes need to be easy to implement or they’ll never last long enough to become long-term habits. Let’s take the key points from this section and condense them down into a simple, step-by-step plan.

Start tracking your current diet with a calorie tracking app and by reading food labels. If you put it in your body, count it.
Compare one week of your normal eating habits with my recommendations and note the differences between the two. Assess which factors will be easy to fix and those that will take more discipline. If you don’t know what intake ranges to aim for, start with a 30% protein, 35% carbohydrate, and 35% fat split. Try to consume at least 30g of protein per meal.
Over the course of a few days or weeks, gradually restructure your meals until their contents and timings fall in line with my suggestions. For example, is your protein intake a little low? If so, slightly increase your portion size per meal. Focus on a transition process that occurs along a realistic timeline and promotes long-term program adherence.
When you finally hit your intake goals and are able to meet them consistently, assess your energy levels and exercise performance. Do you feel mentally sharp and energetic, or have these recent changes resulted in fatigue, mental fog, and/or undesirable changes in body composition? If you don’t feel amazing, play with your food options and intake percentages. Experimentation is essential here.
Keep tracking your food and trying new things. Use this documentation process to truly learn the macronutrient contents of your meals. Calorie counting apps are incredibly useful because they teach us about our habits, but we do not want to manually track intake forever. Teach your eyes to accurately identify what you’re consuming.
When you feel confident that everything’s dialed in for energy balance, start playing with a slight deficit for weight loss or a surplus for weight gain. Building muscle and losing fat will be simple because you took the time to understand your individual dietary needs.

Some will find the process of TDEE calculation and meal remodeling to be easy and straightforward. If you’re currently mindful of what you eat, transitioning to something slightly more structured won’t be too difficult. However, this won’t be the case for everyone. Nutrition can be a difficult subject to understand and breaking bad dietary habits is even harder. If your relationship with food has historically been more problematic than beneficial and you’ve felt discouraged by a lack of progress, focus on the little victories moving forward. Take your time as you form new habits. It’s not a race.

With energy balance requirements calculated and new healthy eating habits formed, our dietary foundation is built. We now know what, when, and how much to eat because we took the time and put in the effort necessary to discover what our body needs. This equilibrium between intake and expenditure is a great place to start a fitness journey, but it can also be an acceptable endpoint for many different training goals. A diet that focuses on energy balance can be a fantastic nutritional strategy to gradually lose fat and build lean tissue at the same time. However, ambitious fat loss and muscle growth goals require more aggressive strategies.

Let’s talk about building muscle.

Maximizing Muscle Growth

Maximizing muscle growth through diet requires a bit of work and planning, but the overall strategy is super simple. Eat more food and eat more often. This section is written to help you understand why eating frequency is critical for hypertrophy and how different macronutrient quantities affect our growth potential.

Don’t try to follow everything in this section perfectly. Focus on the broad strokes and general concepts.

We now know that muscle protein synthesis (MPS) is how our bodies create new muscle tissue. And by combining resistance training with protein-rich meals, we stimulate MPS to a significantly greater degree than that of muscle protein breakdown (MPB). This leads to muscle growth. To maximize our muscle building potential, we need to follow a great exercise program and eat as frequently enough to keep MPS active all day. But we can only utilize this anabolic response to feeding so often.

After being stimulated to peak levels by a meal of 20-40g of protein, MPS rates drop back down to baseline levels after ~90 minutes and the process enters a 3-5 hour refractory period. During this recovery time, the pathways responsible for growth cannot be re-stimulated and any protein or BCAAs consumed between meals will not be used for tissue synthesis. This brief dormancy of MPS activity following stimulation is known as the muscle full effect and it’s the main factor that limits our eating frequency. Because dietary protein is unable to activate MPS for a short amount of time after a meal, it’s important that our eating schedule takes advantage of every feeding opportunity we have. We want to eat as soon as we can fully utilize a meal but not before.

My suggested 4X4 frequency for energy balance does a great job of stimulating muscle protein synthesis throughout the day, and it can be a fantastic plan for most people. But if our goals are to maximize lean tissue development and get the absolute most out of our diet, we can do better. We can theoretically achieve five or six MPS stimulating meals per day by shortening the gaps between meals. This results in a 25-50% increase in MPS activation over the standard 4X4 strategy.

As shown in the examples above, both the 5X and 6X versions are pretty ambitious eating endeavors. Each requires a serious level of dietary dedication. You won’t be able to consistently hit either of these frequencies with an improvised eating schedule. Eating every three hours to achieve six high quality meals per day requires meal preparation, an obsessive level of scheduling, and the elimination of most spontaneous social activities. This eating routine will rule your life and isn’t realistic or emotionally healthy for anyone who isn’t a competitive bodybuilder. However, five meals per day is more manageable and can be accomplished relatively easily by introducing one super useful supplement, casein.

Whey and casein are the two proteins in milk. Whey is more commonly used in protein supplements due to its high BCAA content, quick digestion, water solubility, low cost, and general availability. Casein is also a complete protein, but has slightly lower concentrations of BCAAs and a significantly slower digestion rate. This makes it less desirable for most recovery and meal replacement applications, but casein can be incredibly beneficial when used in the right setting.

Unlike the rapid digestion process of whey, casein coagulates in the digestive tract and drastically slows down nutrient metabolism and transport. When taken before bed as a fifth meal, a casein protein shake mixed with water allows us to stimulate MPS while we sleep without hindering the normal nighttime metabolism of fat. Other protein sources like whey and solid foods can cause an insulin response that interferes with lipolysis (fat metabolism). If you don’t have a dairy allergy and are looking for a simple fifth meal solution to maximize lean gains without putting on extra fat, the slower digestion speed and sustained MPS activity from casein can make it a great option.
Regardless of your meal frequency goals or the strategies you use to accomplish them, you’ll grow faster the more often you stimulate MPS with protein-rich meals.

With our modified meal timing schedule covered, let’s shift gears and look at the macronutrient quantities and caloric distributions necessary to maximize growth.

To build muscle, we need to maintain a daily caloric surplus that’s mainly achieved by increasing our intake of protein and carbohydrates. This surplus should elevate caloric totals ~10-20% above baseline energy balance. If you’re using my recommended starting macronutrient split (30% protein/35% carbohydrate/35% fat), the extra calories may restructure your daily intake percentages to something closer to 35-40% protein, 40-45% carbohydrates, and 20-25% fat. The overall concept here is pretty simple, but to get the most out of this strategy and find long-term success, we need to understand why protein and carbohydrates are so important for growth.

Starting with protein, how much is enough?

A 20-40g serving of quality, complete protein can maximally stimulate MPS. Some studies show there’s only a ~10% difference in MPS activity between 20g and 40g intakes, regardless of body size, with no significant increase seen above 40g. Therefore, doses that exceed this range do not necessarily result in higher rates of MPS. But excess protein is not wasted. High intake quantities don’t stimulate MPS much more than normal (20-40g) doses, but additional protein supports overall tissue development by suppressing the breakdown of existing muscle mass. This means a little extra protein intake can maximally stimulate MPS and suppress breakdown. We can keep more of what we have while building new tissue.

However, completely suppressing breakdown with a high-protein diet might not be the best long-term plan. The normal catabolic process of tissue breakdown likely serves an important role in the maintenance of muscle quality. The MPS/MPB cycle of breaking down structurally compromised muscle mass and replacing it with newly synthesized tissue might be critical to overall muscle health and performance. So, it’s probably not the smartest idea to disrupt this internal regulation system. Therefore, our intake should aim for quantities that help us get the absolute most out of MPS and provide a little extra to slightly suppress MPB.

Most people looking to maximize muscle gains should aim for roughly 30-60g of protein per meal. This range falls in line with my macronutrient intake percentages listed earlier, keeping everything consistent and simple. Studies show that higher protein intakes can be a safe dietary choice as long as you don’t have any kidney health concerns. As always, use this information as a guide to help find what’s best for you.

With protein covered, let’s discuss why we need carbohydrates for maximum muscle growth.

Nutritional choices shape our physiques in drastic ways, but we can’t build bigger and stronger muscles without resistance training. It’s important that each workout is as productive as possible because lean tissue development is largely dependent on the quality of our exercise sessions. Carbohydrates assist with hypertrophy in many different ways, but they contribute to muscle growth most directly by serving as an unrivaled fuel source for high-intensity and high-volume workouts.

Fully saturated glycogen stores in the muscles and liver provide an immediate source of fuel for high-intensity fitness activities that rely on anaerobic glycolysis. Anaerobic glycolysis is a rapid energy delivery system that quickly metabolizes carbohydrates without oxygen. A properly fueled glycolytic energy system helps us lift heavier weight for more reps, stimulate MPS to a greater degree, run farther and faster, and generally improve performance of all max effort exercise endeavors. Carbs give us the energy to get the most out of our muscle building workouts, and we lose top end performance when they’re restricted. If hypertrophy is the goal, consuming an adequate intake of carbohydrates should be a top dietary priority.

Carbohydrates also aid in post-workout recovery and help us sustain an anabolic state outside of the gym. Despite the popularity of the idea, there’s not a small anabolic window for protein consumption immediately following a workout. Studies show that total daily protein intake and overall feeding frequency contribute significantly more to long-term muscle growth than the proximity of any single meal to a workout session. This means if we simply stick to a solid eating schedule and exercise between regularly planned meals, protein timing will be taken care of and no gains will be lost. However, post-workout carbohydrate intake is a little different.

As we increase muscle mass and our bodies become more familiar with carbohydrate fueled lifting, our storage capacity and metabolic efficiency of glycogen increase. Conditioning our muscles to use glycogen results in great workout sessions, but it also creates a metabolic dependency. If we burn through a significant amount of our glycogen stores during a workout, our bodies will recognize this depletion and prioritize carbohydrate replenishment over other post-workout anabolic processes.

Gluconeogenesis is the synthesis of glucose from non-carbohydrate substances. This commonly involves the conversion of amino acids to glucose. Gluconeogenesis can occur following any protein-rich meal but is more common after high-intensity workouts. This means if we don’t place an emphasis on restoring depleted glycogen stores after a tough workout, our bodies will take post-workout protein and turn it into glucose/glycogen. This can reduce MPS activity and increase muscle protein breakdown. Luckily, it’s easily avoidable by consuming carbohydrates and protein together post-workout.

I recommend you consume roughly 35-40% of total daily carbohydrates in your post-workout meal. The examples listed below focus on a 5X feeding frequency, but the same general concept of glycogen replenishment applies to all eating schedules.

As seen above, carbohydrate intake percentages are distributed across five meals. Post-workout meals contain 40% of all daily carbohydrates, while the other meals hold 20%. The last meal of the day is a casein shake mixed with water, so it contains little to no carbohydrates. Don’t get too hung up on the exact percentages here. Focus on the overall strategy.

Carbohydrate sources with higher glycemic index values might be better options for post-workout recovery, but some studies indicate total quantity is the most important factor in glycogen restoration. The opposite may apply to our other meals throughout the day that don’t immediately follow a workout. Lower glycemic index carbohydrates that digest a bit slower can help regulate blood sugar and hormone levels (primarily insulin and testosterone) during the day, leading to a more anabolic environment for muscle growth. Many different strategies can work. Be sure to experiment and stay open minded with your carbohydrates.

There are many other hypertrophy related nutritional factors not covered here, but these few points on protein and carbohydrate intake should give you a great place to start. When combined with an effective weight training program, proper hydration, and a smart sleep schedule, the suggestions listed in this section can help you build the muscle you want.

Now that we’ve covered some of the major dietary factors for growth, let’s discuss strategies for efficient and sustainable fat loss.

Periodized Nutrition for Fat Loss

Weight loss is really simple. Eat a little less and burn a little more to create a daily caloric deficit. This can be accomplished in a number of different ways if you only care to see the scale go down. However, if you want to selectively target fat, keep the muscle you’ve worked so hard to build, and actually feel good during the process, things become more complicated. An effective fat loss strategy requires a personalized approach that promotes healthy and sustainable dietary habits.

In this section, we’ll cover some of the most important components of a fat loss diet. With a little self-control, intake consistency, and nutritional knowledge, you can drop those unwanted pounds and keep them off with less effort than you may think.

To begin, let’s address the section title. Periodized nutrition?

As covered in chapter one, periodization is a way to organize and plan out a schedule. A periodized exercise program is one that implements change by manipulating different variables at predetermined times, creating a cyclic routine when repeated. In contrast, a non-periodized program is the same workout performed forever with no planned changes in weight, reps, or duration. Periodization is most commonly associated with exercise, but it’s also the foundation for many different dietary strategies.

The eating schedules, post-workout glycogen replenishment emphasis, and general macronutrient intake quantities listed throughout this chapter are all components of a structured plan designed to be followed for a set amount of time to achieve a specific goal. That’s periodization. Other areas of fitness, like competitive sports, also employ periodized nutritional tactics by changing up an athlete’s diet to target their in-season versus off-season performance goals.

So, what is periodized nutrition?

It’s a dietary plan that changes over time at predetermined points to help us accomplish specific goals. Periodized nutrition is the opposite of improvised, hunger-driven eating. If not approached correctly, certain dietary habits can wreck our metabolism, make us more likely to gain additional weight in the future, drastically slow down fitness progress, and decrease our quality of life. To keep these unpleasant side effects from occurring, we need to follow an eating strategy that allows us to drop unwanted pounds without slowing us down.

The very basics of this fat loss program aren’t too complicated. We want to combine a slight intake deficit with fat loss cardio, sprinkle in some carbohydrate refeed days, and incorporate ketogenic inspired eating styles at regular intervals to improve fat utilization.

Below is a summary of the fat loss strategy.

Caloric Restriction
Reduce carbohydrate and fat intake ~10% below your normal energy balance needs. Pair this minor caloric reduction with 10-30 minutes of daily fat loss cardio to create a daily energy deficit of 350-700 calories.

Refeed Days
Break up sustained caloric deficit periods with a single carbohydrate refeed day every 4-6 days, resulting in an energy restricted state ~80% of the time. Refeeding back to energy balance or a slight (<5%) surplus allows us to reset the catabolic environment that prolonged deficits create and restore normal hormone balance/sensitivity. This deficit+refeed pattern combined with smart cardiovascular exercise can help us drop 0.5-1% of our body weight per week. Within this range, expect larger losses at the beginning and smaller, consistent progress later.

Macronutrient Split
Most of the time, your diet should be high in protein at ~40% of total daily calories (40-60g per meal) and contain a significant amount of carbohydrates (~30%) and fats (~30%). All three macronutrients are important to exercise performance. Do not eliminate fats or carbohydrates. If you’re lifting weights, eat carbs to fuel and recover from your workouts with the 40% post-workout intake quantity discussed in the Maximizing Muscle Growth section. Experiment with different glycemic-index-value carbohydrates to find what makes you feel the best, perform well, and maintain a consistent rate of fat loss.

Metabolic Flexibility/Keto
Occasionally going “keto” can increase our metabolism of fats and make subsequent fat loss exercise more effective. Every 4th or 5th week, drop carbohydrate intake to ~5-10% (keep fiber rich vegetable intake normal) and increase fats to result in a 40-45% protein, 45-50% fat, and 5-10% carbohydrate split. This mock-keto week maintains energy balance and contains fat loss cardiovascular exercise with no resistance work. If you follow my weight training programs, this ketogenic period occurs during each off week. The last day of the keto week (24 hours before your next resistance training session) should be a carbohydrate refeed day to fuel up for the upcoming resistance workout.

An example calendar is listed below to make all of this a little easier to comprehend. Take note of the day-to-day differences. Some days have lifting and cardio, some only cardio, while the weekends are meant for rest and recovery. This routine follows a Mon/Tues/Thurs/Fri lifting schedule with refeed days occurring every fifth day, but the general concept can be modified and adapted to fit any routine.

Fat loss without exercise is totally possible, but that’s not what we’re doing here. This strategy relies on a combination of intake restriction and cardiovascular exercise to create daily energy deficits. By utilizing these two methods, the intensity and demand of each component is reduced. A flexible diet and reasonable exercise program will be easier to adhere to and more effective long-term than caloric restriction alone. You don’t have to starve yourself to lose weight if exercise is included in your weight loss strategy.

For example, reducing a 2000 calorie energy balance diet by 10% is a difference of 200 calories. We can hit this target by simply removing 9g (9 calories/g) of fat and 30g (4 calories/g) of carbohydrates a day, or with a variety of other carbohydrate/fat combinations. When this minor intake reduction is paired with cardiovascular exercise, the total daily energy deficit can easily double. As few as 10 additional cardio minutes per day on top of your current resistance training routine could be enough to move the scale. Achieving a daily deficit is not that difficult if approached the right way. Use diet and exercise together to make it easy.

With the broad strokes of the calendar covered, let’s dive into the why behind the main points.
If a caloric deficit is our main goal and it can theoretically be achieved without too much effort, why can’t we maintain it indefinitely for faster fat loss? Why are carbohydrate refeed days required?

Losing weight is emotionally and physiologically stressful. Eating less and exercising more essentially puts us in starvation mode where our bodies consume themselves for energy. This catabolic environment is essential for efficient fat loss, but we can’t stay in the red forever. When we maintain a long-term deficit or attempt to crash diet our way to a leaner physique, some pretty unfavorable changes can happen to our sex hormones, thyroid function, and cortisol levels. Side effects like decreased testosterone, male hypogonadism, female athlete triad, increased muscle breakdown, decreased MPS, decreased glycogen synthesis/storage, lower insulin concentrations caused by an impaired endocrine system, and dramatically elevated cortisol levels are all significant issues to consider. But our primary areas of concern relate to thyroid function and energy expenditure.

If sustained for too long, a constant caloric deficit can slow down our metabolism and cause a noticeable drop in total daily energy expenditure. This metabolic downshift is called adaptive thermogenesis, and it’s a calorie sparing response that our bodies initiate in times of starvation. To keep losing weight in a state of adaptive thermogenesis, we’re forced to consistently eat less and exercise more. This can cause us to develop quite a few unhealthy and unsustainable habits. Our general exercise performance can also be negatively affected due to limited energy availability (glycogen delivery and synthesis). This can lead to emotional distress and a loss in muscle mass due to a steady decline in workout quality. Adaptive thermogenesis can also cause us to gain more weight than what we started with.

Under normal conditions, our fat cells (adipocytes) shrink when we lose fat and expand to hold more stored triglycerides when we gain fat. This means our bodies maintain roughly the same number of adipocytes during normal fluctuations in weight, but this quantity can change. Adipocytes can become more sensitive to glucose after periods of rapid weight loss. In this hyper-sensitive state, small fat cells absorb glucose faster than they can store it. Instead of expanding in size to hold newly synthesized triglyceride content, some adipocytes will split to form entirely new cells in a process called hyperplasia. When this increased fat storage capacity (more glucose-sensitive fat cells) is combined with a drastically slowed metabolism due to adaptive thermogenesis, rapid weight gain can cause us to exceed our heaviest starting point. This is why many overweight people can successfully lose weight with crash diets, but tend to gain it back quickly when they return to their previously established energy balance diet. We want healthy sustainability, not miserable starvation.

While it’s important to understand what can go wrong if we don’t approach fat loss in a sensible and safe manner, there’s no need to worry about anything mentioned here. We can successfully avoid these issues by implementing carbohydrate refeed days that replenish glycogen stores, acutely spike insulin levels, and reset many of the hormonal imbalances that occur after longer deficits. Refeed days force us to embrace sustainable lifestyle changes, develop healthy fat loss habits, and they eliminate our ability to crash diet down to a smaller size.

Regarding carbohydrate food sources, you may find higher glycemic index complex carbs that acutely spike insulin and blood sugar to be more effective for fat loss than lower GI options that result in prolonged insulin production. Insulin suppresses fat oxidation and it’s possible that lower GI foods might slow down your progress. But you might find the opposite to be true. Experiment with different carbohydrate sources to learn what makes you feel and perform best.

Refeed days are important, but they do slow us down. How much longer will it take to reach our goals with them added?

A weekly body weight reduction of 0.5-1% is my recommended fat loss range, but you’ll probably find yourself on either side of this window during your fat loss journey. For most people, losses will be greater at the beginning then slowly decrease due to a mixture of physiological, behavioral, and emotional factors. That’s totally fine. Embrace this common progress decline, set your expectations accordingly, and intentionally taper your losses as the last few pounds drop and you close in on your goals. Slowly phasing out of a fat loss mindset and into a normal routine can help solidify newly formed healthy habits. Work with, not against, natural changes in energy expenditure.

You’ve accepted this extended timeline. Great. But why isn’t weight loss progress linear?

Fading program enthusiasm can partially be to blame for a decrease in fat loss, but the main culprit is a normal drop in TDEE due to changes in body mass. Whether you successfully lose 10 or 50 pounds, a leaner version of you will expend fewer calories per day than heavier you did. Weighing less means you won’t require as much energy to move around, sustain basic bodily functions, or fuel exercise. This drop in TDEE also means that intake for energy balance will decrease. Many weight-loss diets stall here because changes in energy balance are not considered and intake stays the same despite lower EB requirements. But if we’re consistently tracking our intake, monitoring changes in weight, and regularly assessing energy levels, we can modify daily caloric totals to reflect fluctuations in TDEE. However, we can’t cut all macronutrients equally.

Fat and carbohydrate intake quantities can be modified to help you achieve your desired deficit, but protein needs to stay high due to its effect on muscle retention and appetite control. Protein is arguably the most important macronutrient for fat loss.

Even the best fat loss diets have some issues with muscle protein synthesis and lean tissue breakdown. The catabolic environment induced by energy restriction has been shown to decrease peak MPS rates by over 25% and significantly increase MPB. Less metabolically active tissue slows fat loss progress, hinders exercise performance, and can lead to injury if MPB is severe enough. These issues are minimized with carbohydrate refeed days, but they’re not completely eliminated. We probably won’t experience much muscle growth during extended periods of fat loss, but we can work to maintain everything we’ve built by eating more protein. Aim for roughly 40-60g of protein per meal to maximally stimulate MPS, minimize muscle breakdown, and suppress the most annoying side effect of all fat loss diets, hunger.

Healthy appetite suppressing strategies are key components of long-term fat loss success because losing weight ultimately depends on intake control. When macronutrients are listed in order of most to least satiating, protein is first, carbohydrates are second, and fats are third. Fats slow down gastric emptying, delaying hunger, but they do not produce the same satiety hormone response as protein or carbohydrates. This means high-protein meals, especially at breakfast and lunch, can help us feel more satisfied and stay full throughout the day. Some studies have shown that slightly shifting calories to the front half of the day can reduce evening cravings and improve self-control during nighttime hours. We shouldn’t have to suffer through ravenous hunger to see progress in our weight loss journey, and a high-protein diet can keep that from happening.

Feeling more satisfied and full helps us adhere to new diets and maintain deficits with less effort, but the emotional response to dietary fulfillment is just as important. This is especially true for those who struggle with mild to severe eating disorders. The satiating effect of high-protein meals can decrease reward style eating habits, produce fewer incidents of mindless snacking, decrease emotion fueled binging, lessen symptoms of eating addiction, and help us establish healthier relationships with food. Protein won’t solve all of our problems, but it can help us consistently make smarter choices.

The last component of this fat loss diet is nutritional ketosis.

When fasting, exercising, or in a carbohydrate restricted state, our livers produce water soluble molecules called ketones. Ketones are synthesized from free fatty acids and glycogen in a process called ketogenesis. Ketones are used by our muscles, heart, and brain for energy. This makes them a viable fuel alternative to glucose for many different biological functions. However, when carbohydrates are consistently present in our diet at moderate to high intake quantities, ketone production will be low because our bodies won’t have a reason to abandon glycolysis. As long as carbs are present, insulin will suppress ketone production and glucose will support brain function and physical activity. Ketosis requires us to starve the body of carbohydrates long enough to force a metabolic shift away from glucose to ketone bodies. This is typically accomplished by following a diet that’s high in fat, very low in carbs, and contains a moderate amount of protein.

After multiple weeks (4+) of strict adherence to a low-carbohydrate diet (less than 25-50g/day or 5-10% of daily calories), our metabolism can shift into a state of nutritional ketosis. When in ketosis, fats and ketone bodies are our primary fuel sources and carbohydrate reliance is minimized. With fats being burned for the majority of our mental and physical energy, blood levels of ketones rise, insulin levels drop, fat oxidation enzyme (lipase) production and mitochondrial activity is increased, and glycogen utilization declines. We basically become supercharged, fat burning machines. And because most of us carry around at least a few pounds of stored body fat, we have a nearly endless supply of energy to fuel daily activities.

A successful ketogenic diet combined with a slight caloric deficit or certain fasting techniques can help us rapidly drop weight, but the health benefits of ketosis are not limited to fat loss. Improved blood lipid profiles, cancer growth suppression, fewer epileptic symptoms, better blood sugar control, increased endurance exercise performance, and a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease can all result from this dietary change. When incorporated correctly and in the right situations, a ketogenic diet can be an excellent alternative macronutrient split for some people.

If nutritional ketosis is potentially a superior fat loss strategy and associated with an impressive list of health benefits, why are we implementing it so infrequently?

Unfortunately, true nutritional ketosis can be very difficult to achieve and even harder to maintain. It can take a minimum of one month for our bodies to metabolically switch from carbohydrates to fats and ketones. This means our diet has to be nearly perfect for at least four weeks before we can reach a state of ketosis, and that same level of intake precision must be sustained for the adaptation to be maintained. If we don’t successfully force a fuel swap during that time, our keto diet can turn into an unpleasant, low-carb diet that leaves us fatigued and unmotivated to exercise.

Due to these demanding requirements, I don’t believe nutritional ketosis is a realistic strategy for most people. A ketogenic state is achievable and far from impossible, but there are too many obstacles in the way of a sustained metabolic adaptation for me to recommend it as a long-term dietary plan for the average person. Instead of trying to implement difficult, high-maintenance diets, I’d rather you focus on realistic fat loss practices that give you more intake flexibility.

Along with being difficult to adhere to, a high-fat diet can also lead to weight gain because fat is the most calorically dense, yet the least satiating macronutrient. Some studies show that long-term high-fat diets can decrease the satiety hormone response to fats by lowering the sensitivity of gut lipid receptors. This means if we have a tendency to eat until we’re full and consume large quantities of fat, we could easily exceed energy balance. Research shows that high-fat diets do not result in more fat loss if our eating habits put us at a caloric surplus. Because weight loss ultimately depends on an energy deficit, a high-fat diet might not be the best plan for long-term fat loss success if you struggle with intake control.

Eliminating carbohydrates and going keto can also drastically limit our high-intensity exercise performance. Because resistance training is a key component to any good fat loss program, it’s important that we have the energy to lift weights well. Fats and ketones are incredible fuel sources for endurance exercise and low-intensity activities, but they can’t compete with carbohydrates for hypertrophy training or HIIT style workouts. A long-term ketogenic diet that hinders the anaerobic glycolytic energy system could cause us to chronically underperform in many fitness settings, build less muscle, lose strength, and see fewer top end cardiovascular improvements.

Carbohydrates are essential for high-intensity exercise, but it can be beneficial to periodically remove them. How can systematically reducing carbs make us better at burning fat?

A long-term ketogenic diet might not be the best nutritional strategy due to its strict intake requirements, weight gain potential, and possible negative effects on exercise performance, but short term applications are very different. Some studies show that lipid oxidation activity can be increased in as little as five days when a ketogenic diet is paired with endurance focused cardiovascular exercise. This research suggests it’s not necessary for us to achieve true nutritional ketosis to improve fat utilization. We most likely won’t reach ketogenic levels of fat oxidation in a week, but 5-10 days can cause a slight metabolic adaptation and train our bodies to rely a bit more on fat and a little less on carbs for energy. This can be easily accomplished by implementing a keto recovery week within a resistance training program. A keto week allows us to drop carbohydrate intake without interfering with resistance training performance. This low-carb period improves fat utilization through a combination of cardio and macronutrient manipulation.

We can theoretically get better and better at using fats for fuel by repeating this pattern. This makes subsequent post-resistance training cardio even more effective. An entire month of keto might be tough to complete successfully, but most of us can handle a week of limited carbs. And we’re not actually trying to achieve nutritional ketosis with this approach, so minor setbacks or accidental high-carb days won’t completely derail progress. When paired with intermittent fasting, this a more realistic and sustainable implementation of a ketogenic diet that allows us to simultaneously pursue resistance training at a high level.

To summarize, focus on a slight daily deficit, incorporate carbohydrate refeed days, and play with keto while lifting weights and following a smart fat loss cardiovascular exercise program. Be smart about your intake levels so you can properly fuel yourself to perform well in the gym and in life. Food is not your enemy, exercise is not a punishment, and this fat loss strategy should be temporary. Reach your goal and work to maintain it. Take the time to learn what your body needs and form healthy habits that will last a lifetime. Change takes time and a considerable amount of effort, so be sure to celebrate every minor victory along the way.

I believe the plan outlined above is an effective fat loss strategy, but you should do what works best for you. Follow this plan perfectly, modify it slightly to fit your needs, or take a few ideas and add them to your existing routine. Whatever you choose to do, take the time to track your eating habits so you can accurately calculate your individual needs. This approach doesn’t work if you’re guessing.

Fasting & Fat Loss

I don’t recommend regularly occurring, extended periods of fasting for most people. However, moderate fasting strategies can be effective for heavier individuals looking to safely expedite their fat loss progress.

If you’re interested in fasting beyond 12 hours daily, consider modifying the 4X4 outline to 3X4 and implementing a 16:8 (Hours Fasting : Hours Feeding) fasting routine. This results in three meals per day, each separated by four hours, with 16 hours of fasting. Pay close attention to any changes in exercise performance or mood/energy levels during this time. Modify your eating windows to fit what’s best for you. I personally like to begin my fast 3-5 hours before bed.

Alcohol & Exercise

Alcohol is fun. An occasional drink or three can be a great way to unwind after a long day, celebrate a special occasion, or be more social in a group setting. And when consumed in moderation, alcohol and fitness can coexist peacefully. Alcohol might not be part of the food pyramid, but it’s common enough in most of our diets to deserve brief attention.

In this section, we’ll quickly cover some major side effects associated with excessive alcohol consumption.

At about seven calories per gram, alcohol is an energy-dense substance. And because we typically don’t chug pure ethanol, the extra calories in our drinks can add up fast. Gaining a little extra weight might be your only drinking concern, but alcohol is a powerful drug that can disrupt fitness progress if intake is too high.

Some possible side effects include –

Decreased lipid oxidation can hinder fat loss progress and endurance exercise performance.
Decreased glycogen storage/synthesis can negatively impact resistance training intensity.
Decreased baseline hydration/rates of rehydration can impact exercise performance, cognitive ability, and recovery.
Decreased blood flow to muscles can hurt exercise performance and recovery.
Decreased MPS can result in slower muscle growth/recovery and possibly muscle loss.
Decreased CNS excitability can negatively affect motor unit recruitment and fiber activation, resulting in strength and size losses.
Decreased brain phospholipid levels can negatively affect cognitive ability and mood.
Decreased immune function can keep us out of the gym due to frequent illness.
Increased inflammation can slow down recovery, hinder exercise performance, impact digestion, and hurt cognitive ability.
Decreased sleep quality can alter hormone levels, mood, energy, and recovery.
Decreased testosterone can limit growth and general exercise performance.

It’s important to note that nearly all of these issues are caused by frequent, high volume consumption and aren’t common with moderate intake. While that’s probably a comforting point, there isn’t a clear line between low and high quantities of alcohol. Differences in body size, composition, hydration levels, and stomach food contents mean the same drink can affect us all differently.

So, how much can you drink and still see progress? That’s for you to figure out.

If fitness really matters to you and you’re determined to completely eliminate all of the problems listed above, don’t drink. Alcohol can’t slow us down if we don’t consume it. To avoid hangovers and the speed bumps caused by drinking, abstinence is by far the most effective strategy. But that approach is unrealistic for many.

Life is all about priorities and choices. Reaching your performance potential requires a high level of self-control and restriction. To be the best, you can’t afford any missteps. In contrast, exercise goals that are centered on being healthy, generally fit, and looking good have plenty of room for fun. You don’t have to avoid alcohol to get the most out of your workouts, but you can’t drink excessively and expect to see consistent progress either. So, if you aren’t willing to give up your favorite vice, be a responsible adult, drink in moderation, stay hydrated, and avoid getting drunk.

If you’re consistent in the gym and in the kitchen, but aren’t seeing the results you expect, reevaluate your drinking habits. Track alcohol intake just like carbs, fats, and protein.

Make smart choices.

Registered Dietitians & Supplements

I am not a nutrition expert. My degrees and education are exercise-based, not dietetic. I have multiple personal training certifications, but none of them focus on nutrition. And I’ve never shadowed or interned with any nutrition professional. Yet, I can legally call myself a Nutritionist in the United States because that title is not legally protected. This low barrier to entry means your nutrition coach may be vastly underqualified to give you detailed health advice and might not fully understand many of the topics they’re so opinionated about.

Job opportunities for beginners are great, but so are minimum qualifications. To get the best nutrition advice, work with a registered dietitian (RD). Registered dietitians in the United States must have at least a bachelor’s degree, are required to complete a dietetic internship program, and must pass a state regulated exam to obtain their license. Quality and knowledge will vary between RDs and it’s up to you to research the best reviewed options, but the years of work that are required to obtain those two little letters make most RDs knowledgeable and trustworthy sources of information.

Registered dietitians also offer specific services not available to trainers or general nutritionists. By working with local labs, RDs can order specific blood tests that check for food sensitivities/allergies, micronutrient deficiencies, hormonal imbalances, blood lipid profiles, causes of inflammation, and many other food related issues. A great RD will alter your current eating habits and/or prescribe certain supplements to successfully treat any problems detected.

What about supplements? This chapter is focused primarily on macronutrients because I believe that the overwhelming majority of our diet should come from whole foods and not shakes, bars, pills, or powders. However, there are quite a few dietary supplements that can be really beneficial to our general health and exercise performance.

Some examples of helpful supplements include but are not limited to –

Fish Oil/Omega-3
Vitamin D
Multivitamin
Probiotic
Creatine

These supplements can probably help most people, but results will vary. We’re all unique and require different things. To really know what’s best for your body, where you may be deficient, and how to optimally strategize for nutritional success, work with a registered dietitian.

Final Thoughts

This chapter contains quite a few nutritional suggestions, but many variables were intentionally left open to experimentation. What works best for you will be different than what’s most successful for your neighbor. There’s no one-size-fits-all for food choices, portion sizes, or meal compositions. An effective dietary strategy is one that’s designed to target certain goals, full of all three macronutrients, and built around the needs of the individual following it.

If most of the information in this guide has been new to you, just focus on the basics. Be a little better each day, try to stay consistent with your intake targets, track what you eat, focus on your goals, and don’t beat yourself up if you occasionally get sidetracked.

Dietary goals require dedication and hard work to accomplish, but food should be fun. Keep it that way.

Experiment by manipulating different variables. Find what works best for you. Share what you discover. Have fun.

References

Alghannam, A., Gonzalez, J., & Betts, J. (2018). Restoration of Muscle Glycogen and Functional Capacity: Role of Post-Exercise Carbohydrate and Protein Co-Ingestion. Nutrients, 10(2), 253.

Aragon, A. A., Schoenfeld, B. J., Wildman, R., Kleiner, S., VanDusseldorp, T., Taylor, L., … Antonio, J. (2017). International society of sports nutrition position stand: diets and body composition. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14(1).

Atherton, P. J., Etheridge, T., Watt, P. W., Wilkinson, D., Selby, A., Rankin, D., … Rennie, M. J. (2010). Muscle full effect after oral protein: time-dependent concordance and discordance between human muscle protein synthesis and mTORC1 signaling. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 92(5), 1080–1088.

Atherton, P. J., & Smith, K. (2012). Muscle protein synthesis in response to nutrition and exercise. The Journal of Physiology, 590(5), 1049–1057.

Atkinson, F. S., Foster-Powell, K., & Brand-Miller, J. C. (2008). International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes care, 31(12), 2281–2283.

Barnes, M. J. (2014). Alcohol: Impact on Sports Performance and Recovery in Male Athletes. Sports Medicine, 44(7), 909–919.

Bartlett, J. D., Hawley, J. A., & Morton, J. P. (2014). Carbohydrate availability and exercise training adaptation: Too much of a good thing? European Journal of Sport Science, 15(1), 3–12.

BLUNDELL, J., STUBBS, R., GOLDING, C., CRODEN, F., ALAM, R., WHYBROW, S., … LAWTON, C. (2005). Resistance and susceptibility to weight gain: Individual variability in response to a high-fat diet. Physiology & Behavior, 86(5), 614–622.

Bytomski, J. R. (2017). Fueling for Performance. Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 10(1), 47–53.

Calder, P. C. (2017). Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes: from molecules to man. Biochemical Society Transactions, 45(5), 1105–1115.

Carreiro, A. L., Dhillon, J., Gordon, S., Higgins, K. A., Jacobs, A. G., McArthur, B. M., … Mattes, R. D. (2016). The Macronutrients, Appetite, and Energy Intake. Annual review of nutrition, 36, 73–103.

Cederbaum A. I. (2012). Alcohol metabolism. Clinics in liver disease, 16(4), 667–685.

Chen, L., Xie, Y. M., Pei, J. H., Kuang, J., Chen, H. M., Chen, Z., … Lin, J. X. (2018). Sugar-sweetened beverage intake and serum testosterone levels in adult males 20-39 years old in the United States. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 16(1), 61.

Chianese, R., Coccurello, R., Viggiano, A., Scafuro, M., Fiore, M., Coppola, G., … Meccariello, R. (2018). Impact of Dietary Fats on Brain Functions. Current neuropharmacology, 16(7), 1059–1085.

Churchward-Venne, T. A., Pinckaers, P. J. M., Smeets, J. S. J., Peeters, W. M., Zorenc, A. H., Schierbeek, H., … van Loon, L. J. C. (2019). Myofibrillar and Mitochondrial Protein Synthesis Rates Do Not Differ in Young Men following the Ingestion of Carbohydrate with Milk Protein, Whey, or Micellar Casein after Concurrent Resistance- and Endurance-Type Exercise. The Journal of Nutrition.

Close, G. L., Hamilton, D. L., Philp, A., Burke, L. M., & Morton, J. P. (2016). New strategies in sport nutrition to increase exercise performance. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 98, 144–158.

Coelho-Júnior, H. J., Rodrigues, B., Uchida, M., & Marzetti, E. (2018). Low Protein Intake Is Associated with Frailty in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Nutrients, 10(9), 1334.

Cohn, J. S., Kamili, A., Wat, E., Chung, R. W., & Tandy, S. (). Dietary phospholipids and intestinal cholesterol absorption. Nutrients, 2(2), 116–127.

Dashti, H. M., Mathew, T. C., Hussein, T., Asfar, S. K., Behbahani, A., Khoursheed, M. A., … Al-Zaid, N. S. (2004). Long-term effects of a ketogenic diet in obese patients. Experimental and clinical cardiology, 9(3), 200–205.

de Gavelle, E., Huneau, J. F., Bianchi, C. M., Verger, E. O., & Mariotti, F. (2017). Protein Adequacy Is Primarily a Matter of Protein Quantity, Not Quality: Modeling an Increase in Plant:Animal Protein Ratio in French Adults. Nutrients, 9(12), 1333.

Deutz, N. E. P., Bauer, J. M., Barazzoni, R., Biolo, G., Boirie, Y., Bosy-Westphal, A., … Calder, P. C. (2014). Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: Recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group. Clinical Nutrition, 33(6), 929–936.

Dhillon KK, Gupta S. Biochemistry, Ketogenesis. [Updated 2019 Apr 21]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493179/

Duca, F. A., Sakar, Y., & Covasa, M. (2013). The modulatory role of high fat feeding on gastrointestinal signals in obesity. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 24(10), 1663–1677.

Escobar, K. A., Morales, J., & Vandusseldorp, T. A. (2016). The Effect of a Moderately Low and High Carbohydrate Intake on Crossfit Performance. International journal of exercise science, 9(3), 460–470.

Fagone, P., & Jackowski, S. (2009). Membrane phospholipid synthesis and endoplasmic reticulum function. Journal of lipid research, 50 Suppl(Suppl), S311–S316.

Fernandes, M. F., Sharma, S., Hryhorczuk, C., Auguste, S., & Fulton, S. (2013). Nutritional Controls of Food Reward. Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 37(4), 260–268.

FoodData Central. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/

Gershuni, V. M., Yan, S. L., & Medici, V. (2018). Nutritional Ketosis for Weight Management and Reversal of Metabolic Syndrome. Current Nutrition Reports.

Gorissen, S. H. M., Crombag, J. J. R., Senden, J. M. G., Waterval, W. A. H., Bierau, J., Verdijk, L. B., & van Loon, L. J. C. (2018). Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates. Amino Acids.

Hamley, S. (2017). The effect of replacing saturated fat with mostly n-6 polyunsaturated fat on coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Nutrition Journal, 16(1).

Hebebrand, J., Albayrak, Ö., Adan, R., Antel, J., Dieguez, C., de Jong, J., … Dickson, S. L. (2014). “Eating addiction”, rather than “food addiction”, better captures addictive-like eating behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 295–306.

Higdon, J., Drake, V. J., Angelo, G., & Jump, D. B. (2019, April 23). Essential Fatty Acids. Retrieved from https://lpi.oregonstate.edu/mic/other-nutrients/essential-fatty-acids

Higdon, J., Drake, V. J., Delage, B., & Liu, S. (2019, January 02). Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load. Retrieved from https://lpi.oregonstate.edu/mic/food-beverages/glycemic-index-glycemic-load

Hoffman, J. R., & Falvo, M. J. (2004). Protein – Which is Best?. Journal of sports science & medicine, 3(3), 118–130.

Holscher H. D. (). Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut microbes, 8(2), 172–184.

Holt, S. H., Miller, J. C., & Petocz, P. (1997). An insulin index of foods: the insulin demand generated by 1000-kJ portions of common foods. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 66(5), 1264–1276.

Holtzman, B., & Ackerman, K. (2019). Measurement, Determinants, and Implications of Energy Intake in Athletes. Nutrients, 11(3), 665.

Howarth, K. R., Phillips, S. M., MacDonald, M. J., Richards, D., Moreau, N. A., & Gibala, M. J. (2010). Effect of glycogen availability on human skeletal muscle protein turnover during exercise and recovery. Journal of Applied Physiology, 109(2), 431–438.

Hu, T., & Bazzano, L. A. (2014). The low-carbohydrate diet and cardiovascular risk factors: Evidence from epidemiologic studies. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 24(4), 337–343.

Jäger, R., Kerksick, C. M., Campbell, B. I., Cribb, P. J., Wells, S. D., Skwiat, T. M., … Antonio, J. (2017). International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: protein and exercise. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14(1).

Jeukendrup, A. E. (2017). Periodized Nutrition for Athletes. Sports Medicine, 47(S1), 51–63.

Kanter M. (2017). High-Quality Carbohydrates and Physical Performance: Expert Panel Report. Nutrition today, 53(1), 35–39.

Kerksick, C. M., Arent, S., Schoenfeld, B. J., Stout, J. R., Campbell, B., Wilborn, C. D., … Antonio, J. (2017). International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutrient timing. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14(1).

Kim, I.-Y., Deutz, N. E. P., & Wolfe, R. R. (2018). Update on maximal anabolic response to dietary protein. Clinical Nutrition, 37(2), 411–418.

Küllenberg, D., Taylor, L. A., Schneider, M., & Massing, U. (2012). Health effects of dietary phospholipids. Lipids in health and disease, 11, 3.

Liu, A. G., Ford, N. A., Hu, F. B., Zelman, K. M., Mozaffarian, D., & Kris-Etherton, P. M. (2017). A healthy approach to dietary fats: understanding the science and taking action to reduce consumer confusion. Nutrition journal, 16(1), 53.

Lowery L. M. (2004). Dietary fat and sports nutrition: a primer. Journal of sports science & medicine, 3(3), 106–117.

Ma, S., & Suzuki, K. (2019). Keto-Adaptation and Endurance Exercise Capacity, Fatigue Recovery, and Exercise-Induced Muscle and Organ Damage Prevention: A Narrative Review. Sports, 7(2), 40.

Manore, M. M. (2005). Exercise and the Institute of Medicine Recommendations for Nutrition. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 4(4), 193–198.

Masood W, Uppaluri KR. Ketogenic Diet. [Updated 2019 Mar 21]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499830/

Melina, V., Craig, W., & Levin, S. (2016). Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 116(12), 1970–1980.

MInguez-Alarcón, L., Chavarro, J. E., Mendiola, J., Roca, M., Tanrikut, C., Vioque, J., … Torres-Cantero, A. M. (2016). Fatty acid intake in relation to reproductive hormones and testicular volume among young healthy men. Asian journal of andrology, 19(2), 184–190.

Moro, T., Tinsley, G., Bianco, A., Marcolin, G., Pacelli, Q. F., Battaglia, G., … Paoli, A. (2016). Effects of eight weeks of time-restricted feeding (16/8) on basal metabolism, maximal strength, body composition, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk factors in resistance-trained males. Journal of Translational Medicine, 14(1).

Mul, J. D., Stanford, K. I., Hirshman, M. F., & Goodyear, L. J. (2015). Exercise and Regulation of Carbohydrate Metabolism. Molecular and Cellular Regulation of Adaptation to Exercise, 17–37.

Mumford, S. L., Chavarro, J. E., Zhang, C., Perkins, N. J., Sjaarda, L. A., Pollack, A. Z., … Wactawski-Wende, J. (2016). Dietary fat intake and reproductive hormone concentrations and ovulation in regularly menstruating women. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 103(3), 868–877.

Nagata, C., Takatsuka, N., Kawakami, N., & Shimizu, H. (2000). Relationships Between Types of Fat Consumed and SerumEstrogen and Androgen Concentrations in Japanese Men. Nutrition and Cancer, 38(2), 163–167.

Nettleton, J. A., Brouwer, I. A., Geleijnse, J. M., & Hornstra, G. (2017). Saturated Fat Consumption and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Ischemic Stroke: A Science Update. Annals of nutrition & metabolism, 70(1), 26–33.

Norton, L. E., Wilson, G. J., Layman, D. K., Moulton, C. J., & Garlick, P. J. (2012). Leucine content of dietary proteins is a determinant of postprandial skeletal muscle protein synthesis in adult rats. Nutrition & metabolism, 9(1), 67.

Nowson, C., & O’Connell, S. (2015). Protein Requirements and Recommendations for Older People: A Review. Nutrients, 7(8), 6874–6899.

Nutrition and Athletic Performance. (2016). Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(3), 543–568.

Oltmanns, K. M., Fruehwald-Schultes, B., Kern, W., Born, J., Fehm, H. L., & Peters, A. (2001). Hypoglycemia, But Not Insulin, Acutely Decreases LH and T Secretion in Men. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 86(10), 4913–4919.

Paddon-Jones, D., & Leidy, H. (2014). Dietary protein and muscle in older persons. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 17(1), 5–11.

Peos, J. J., Norton, L. E., Helms, E. R., Galpin, A. J., & Fournier, P. (2019). Intermittent Dieting: Theoretical Considerations for the Athlete. Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 7(1), 22.

Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrient Supplementation. (2009). Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(12), 2073–2085.

Punchard, N. A., Whelan, C. J., & Adcock, I. (2004). The Journal of Inflammation. Journal of inflammation (London, England), 1(1), 1.

Robinson, M. M., Soop, M., Sohn, T. S., Morse, D. M., Schimke, J. M., Klaus, K. A., & Nair, K. S. (2014). High insulin combined with essential amino acids stimulates skeletal muscle mitochondrial protein synthesis while decreasing insulin sensitivity in healthy humans. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 99(12), E2574–E2583.

Sacks, F. M., Carey, V. J., Anderson, C. A., Miller, E. R., 3rd, Copeland, T., Charleston, J., … Appel, L. J. (2014). Effects of high vs low glycemic index of dietary carbohydrate on cardiovascular disease risk factors and insulin sensitivity: the OmniCarb randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 312(23), 2531–2541.

Sacks, F. M., Lichtenstein, A. H., Wu, J. H. Y., Appel, L. J., Creager, M. A., Kris-Etherton, P. M., … Van Horn, L. V. (2017). Dietary Fats and Cardiovascular Disease: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 136(3), e1–e23.

Sallinen, J., Pakarinen, A., Fogelholm, M., Alen, M., Volek, J., Kraemer, W., & Häkkinen, K. (2007). Dietary Intake, Serum Hormones, Muscle Mass and Strength During Strength Training in 49 – 73-Year-Old Men. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 28(12), 1070–1076.

Schoenfeld, B., Aragon, A., & Krieger, J. W. (2013). The effect of protein timing on muscle strength and hypertrophy: a meta-analysis. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 10(1), 53.

Seimon, R. V., Taylor, P., Little, T. J., Noakes, M., Standfield, S., Clifton, P. M., … Feinle-Bisset, C. (2013). Effects of acute and longer-term dietary restriction on upper gut motility, hormone, appetite, and energy-intake responses to duodenal lipid in lean and obese men. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99(1), 24–34.

Shang, T., Liu, L., Zhou, J., Zhang, M., Hu, Q., Fang, M., … Gong, Z. (2017). Protective effects of various ratios of DHA/EPA supplementation on high-fat diet-induced liver damage in mice. Lipids in health and disease, 16(1), 65.

Shreiner, A. B., Kao, J. Y., & Young, V. B. (2015). The gut microbiome in health and in disease. Current opinion in gastroenterology, 31(1), 69–75.

Simopoulos A. P. (2016). An Increase in the Omega-6/Omega-3 Fatty Acid Ratio Increases the Risk for Obesity. Nutrients, 8(3), 128.

Singh, M. (2005). Essential fatty acids, DHA and human brain. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 72(3), 239–242.

Soliman G. A. (2018). Dietary Cholesterol and the Lack of Evidence in Cardiovascular Disease. Nutrients, 10(6), 780.

Stokes, T., Hector, A. J., Morton, R. W., McGlory, C., & Phillips, S. M. (2018). Recent Perspectives Regarding the Role of Dietary Protein for the Promotion of Muscle Hypertrophy with Resistance Exercise Training. Nutrients, 10(2), 180.

Tiidus P. M. (2011). Benefits of estrogen replacement for skeletal muscle mass and function in post-menopausal females: evidence from human and animal studies. The Eurasian journal of medicine, 43(2), 109–114.

Turcotte, L. P. (1999). ROLE OF FATS IN EXERCISE. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 18(3), 485–498.

Vella, L. D., & Cameron-Smith, D. (2010). Alcohol, Athletic Performance and Recovery. Nutrients, 2(8), 781–789.

Villareal, D. T., & Holloszy, J. O. (2006). DHEA enhances effects of weight training on muscle mass and strength in elderly women and men. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 291(5), E1003–E1008.

Volek, J. S., Noakes, T., & Phinney, S. D. (2014). Rethinking fat as a fuel for endurance exercise. European Journal of Sport Science, 15(1), 13–20.

Weaver, C. M., Dwyer, J., Fulgoni, V. L., King, J. C., Leveille, G. A., MacDonald, R. S., … Schnakenberg, D. (2014). Processed foods: contributions to nutrition. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99(6), 1525–1542.

Weinert D. J. (2009). Nutrition and muscle protein synthesis: a descriptive review. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 53(3), 186–193.

Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S., Nieuwenhuizen, A., Tomé, D., Soenen, S., & Westerterp, K. R. (2009). Dietary Protein, Weight Loss, and Weight Maintenance. Annual Review of Nutrition, 29(1), 21–41.

Wilcox G. (2005). Insulin and insulin resistance. The Clinical biochemist. Reviews, 26(2), 19–39.

Wolfe R. R. (2017). Branched-chain amino acids and muscle protein synthesis in humans: myth or reality?. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14, 30.

The post Nutrition: Fueling for Fitness appeared first on Fitstra.

Cool Down: Stretching & SMR

Samuel Stephens — Thu, 02 Jan 2025 18:54:28 +0000

Get the Full Book

This guide is one chapter from Fitness & Nutrition Programming for Beginners. If you enjoy reading it, consider purchasing the full book either as a PDF or paperback. Thanks!

Cool Down: Stretching & SMR

How to build an effective cool down routine and the fitness benefits of self-myofascial release and static stretching.

Chill Out

After a physically and mentally demanding session, it’s easy to pack up and immediately leave the gym. No stretching. No foam rolling. Just rack the weights and get out. It can be tempting to skip the cool down because this portion seems so minimally beneficial compared to the difficult stuff that was just completed. It might only be 5% of our total workout time, but these few minutes can help with so much more than range of motion.

An effective post-workout cool down routine can directly improve hypertrophy, strength, flexibility, and recovery time while reducing soreness, future risk of injury, and joint imbalances. A small investment of time can drastically impact our exercise progress and session effectiveness.

In this chapter, we’ll define cool down, look at some benefits of various stretching techniques, and cover how to build an easy and effective routine.

Cool Down Definition & Benefits

Cool down components and methods vary among different programs and social circles, but they all have the same basic goals. A cool down is a 5-15 minute period that occurs immediately after a workout. It includes exercises designed to improve flexibility, reduce soreness/inflammation, and give participants time to return to baseline heart rates and body temperatures. The term cool down is used here because of its widespread familiarity, not due to any significant emphasis placed on temperature reduction.

A great cool down can result in the following acute and long-term benefits –

Increased flexibility/range of motion
Increased hypertrophy
Increased strength
Increased quality of movement
Increased blood flow
Increased balance
Increased recovery
Increased ATP production
Decreased risk of injury
Decreased soreness (DOMS)
Decreased inflammation
Decreased joint imbalances

An increase in flexibility is expected, but the other potential improvements listed make it obvious that stretching does more than simply affect range of motion. If we want to perform our best in and out of the gym, we need to be following a great cool down routine.

Components of the Cool Down

The Fitstra cool down strategy is very simple. It massages the muscles worked that day then stretches them out. Research shows that both self-myofascial release (SMR) and static stretching techniques can significantly increase a joint’s range of motion when performed independently, but results are greater when these two are combined.

As seen above, the cool down process starts with self-myofascial release and ends with static stretching. To make sure we’re all speaking the same language and understand what’s being discussed, let’s quickly unpack these terms.

Our muscles and all of their major internal longitudinal structures (fascicles, fibers, and myofibrils) are covered in a collagen sheath called fascia. Similar to how skin covers our body, fascia encase our muscles in a thin layer of connective tissue that aids in elasticity, nutrient delivery, and compartmental structure. Fascia also surrounds internal organs, so the prefix myo in myofascial means we’re specifically talking about muscle fascia.

When we apply pressure to our muscles with tools like foam rollers, we temporarily reduce tension and can break up fascial adhesions. Self-myofascial release means that we’re giving ourselves a massage with a tool and releasing tension from soft tissues. Nothing too complicated.

A static stretch is a stretching technique where a muscle is lengthened until noticeable passive tension is achieved, then held in that stretched state for a specific amount of time. Unlike dynamic stretching in the warm up, static stretching does not involve any movement once the stretch begins.

With terminology covered, let’s discuss why these components are so beneficial.

Self-Myofascial Release: Why

There are quite a few great performance benefits associated with self-myofascial release. Some enhancements are due to physical changes within muscles, while others are neuromuscular. These acute responses from massage result in faster recovery times and more effective static stretching. To start things off, let’s talk about soreness and blood flow.

The delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS) is the pain we feel in our muscles after a tough workout. The exact cause of DOMS is not fully understood, but it’s thought to stem from various types of muscle tissue damage and structural disruption. Soreness is common, but it’s not a training symptom we want to experience at high levels. For this damage to be repaired, our muscles need to be taken care of properly. A great diet, adequate hydration, and a healthy sleep schedule can help ensure our bodies are receiving and synthesizing the nutrients they need to recover. But when our muscles are damaged, blood flow can be impeded due to inflammation and changes in tissue structure. Luckily, foam rolling and other self-myofascial release techniques can reduce soreness and speed up the recovery process by increasing blood flow.

When self-myofascial release techniques are performed correctly, fascia, muscles, and arteries are made more elastic through massage. Decreased arterial stiffness and modifications to the viscoelastic properties of tissues result in vasodilation and acute, local improvements to blood circulation. Meaning, when we use a foam roller on a specific area, the targeted muscles and arteries experience better blood flow at higher total volumes because the tissues are more pliable. Damaged muscles recover faster when they receive more blood. Quicker recovery times reduce inflammation, increase growth, improve energy production, and benefit general performance in all future resistance training endeavors.

The same underlying mechanisms and physiological changes that increase blood flow also improve a muscle’s longitudinal stretching potential. Muscles and fascia that are more elastic and less resistant to being lengthened can be stretched to a greater degree. Research suggests that self-myofascial release can increase heat, muscle plasticity/extensibility, and possibly break up fascial adhesions that impede movement. These physical changes can result in greater ranges of motion during a static stretch due to improved viscoelastic muscle properties. SMR makes rope more like rubber.

On the neuromuscular side of things, SMR appears to inhibit the reflex response of a muscle, making it more relaxed and susceptible to stretching. This response is called autogenic inhibition. The broad strokes of this theory state that when we apply pressure to a muscle through SMR, changes in tissue length, tension, and levels of pain are registered by local sensory receptors within a muscle. These signals are then sent to our central nervous system as a warning to reduce muscle contraction force and neuromuscular excitability. This warning signal relaxes muscle tissues and makes them less reactive to minor changes in discomfort, allowing them to be stretched further than if they were behaving normally. To summarize a summary, self-myofascial release causes our bodies to sense a potential risk of injury and respond by relaxing the affected muscles for a short period of time to keep them safe. This relaxed window is when we apply static stretching.

Static Stretching: Why

Similar to self-myofascial release, static stretching produces both neuromuscular and physiological changes that vary in duration. The end result of a great static stretching routine is commonly assumed to only be improved flexibility, but there are quite a few other significant benefits. Static stretching can directly induce hypertrophy, improve strength output, and reduce risk of injury while under load. We can be bigger, stronger, and safer with a little stretching.

In a weight training setting, our muscles contract against resistance and cause active tension to build. This tension loads our muscle fibers with mechanical stress and causes sensory receptors in tissues to stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis. This overly simplified summary of mechanical loading and protein synthesis is how we increase the size of a muscle when we lift. When static stretching is performed correctly, our muscles relax and don’t generate any active tension. However, they do generate passive tension at longer lengths. This passive form of loading can cause muscle protein synthesis to be triggered.

Static stretching mimics the mechanical stress of an eccentric contraction by lengthening sarcomeres beyond their resting size and loading muscle fibers with enough force to generate a growth response. The elastic nature of muscle tissue is what limits our range of motion and builds passive tension in the tissue. Like eccentric contractions, this style of mechanical loading primarily results in new sarcomeres grown in series (sarcomeres added to the ends of myofibrils). Static stretching alone isn’t going to result in a massive difference in overall size, but stretching can add new tissue. And if it adds mass, that’s a growth opportunity worth taking advantage of.

Stretching can also make us stronger by changing the length-tension relationship of our muscles. The force a muscle generates is partially dependent on its length. Both long and short sarcomere lengths don’t allow for an optimal number of actin/myosin cross-bridges. This means we’re weaker at the top and bottom of a contraction, and produce peak force somewhere in the middle. By increasing the flexibility and functional range of motion of a muscle, we alter the length-tension relationship and create a larger middle section of the force production curve.

As seen above, muscles that are lengthened through static stretching don’t produce more peak force than their tight counterparts. Instead, they maintain maximum strength output at longer lengths. Longer fibers and more uniform sarcomere shapes extend the length-tension curve to the right, and allow us to work within an optimal strength zone for a greater percentage of a joint’s range of motion. Applied practically, this change in physiology translates to more control and force production at the bottom of a heavy lift, allowing us to get out of the hole with less strain. Like the hypertrophy gains mentioned earlier, changes in strength due to muscle lengthening are modest, but it would be dumb to pass up these easily attainable benefits.

Altering a muscle’s length-tension relationship can also reduce the risk of injury. Take a second and look back at the length-tension graphs above. Wider peak force plateaus signify that maximum muscle tension is being distributed more evenly throughout a joint’s range of motion. In tighter muscles, that plateau resembles something closer to a narrow point, and the greatest forces are experienced suddenly during one small segment of a contraction. By extending a muscle’s optimal force output length, we can control heavier weight at longer fiber lengths and can minimize acute spikes in tension. These two factors can help minimize the chance of strains and sprains.

When combined with appropriate corrective exercises, static stretching can also effectively treat joint imbalances. The likelihood of knee, low back, shoulder, and other common injuries can be decreased when joints are aligned properly. By stretching tight, overworked muscles, we can improve the activation of their weak, overly lengthened antagonists.

Let’s now shift our focus from cool down theory to practice.

How to SMR

Self-myofascial release can be accomplished with a few different implements, but I recommend you limit your toolkit to foam rollers, massage balls, barbells, and mobility sticks because they all rely on the same general method of application. These items allow us to apply high levels of pressure to the entire length of a muscle by using slow and controlled sweeping motions for 30-60 seconds. Because that general overview isn’t too helpful, let’s dive into the specifics of pressure, movement, and duration.

How much pressure? A lot. SMR studies vary quite a bit in experiment design and tool application, but there’s a clear link between pressure and results. The more force we can place on a tissue, the better. Self-myofascial release should cause mild discomfort and possibly even very low levels of pain when done correctly, but the sensation should be far from unbearable. Using a 10 point pain scale, the SMR ouch-factor should peak at ~7/10 but not exceed it. If you have experience with deep tissue massage, the feeling should be similar. Simultaneously relaxing and uncomfortable.

To ensure an entire muscle is being hit evenly, the pressure applied needs to constantly move longitudinally and slightly laterally (end to end and side to side). Studies show that SMR can be effective with a variety of different movement patterns as long as certain pressure and time guidelines are met. To keep SMR as uncomplicated as possible, I recommend you roll at a steady speed of 1-3 inches per second, work along the entire length of a muscle by sweeping back and forth in both directions (proximal to distal, distal to proximal, proximal to distal, etc) while slowly working side to side to ensure the entire surface area is covered.

For example, when rolling out your quads with a barbell while seated on the floor, start at the hip, roll the bar to your knee, reverse the direction of movement back to the hip, and keep that pattern going until the desired duration is reached. While the barbell is traveling back and forth along the length of your thigh, internally and externally rotate your femur to equally target the middle, inside, and outside muscles.

In spots that are noticeably more sore, slow down your rolling speed and work carefully over the muscle to keep discomfort levels manageable. Reduce roller speed as pain increases to minimize the risk of further tissue inflammation and give sensitive areas more massage time. If you’re not sure how much pressure to use, start on the lower end and work your way up as you become more comfortable with the exercise.

Regarding SMR time and frequency, work back and forth over the target area for 2-3 sets, each set lasting 30-60 seconds. Take a 5-10 second break between SMR rounds. All sets of SMR should be performed consecutively on a single muscle before moving onto the next.

How to Static Stretch

Static stretching isn’t super complicated, but it’s easy to screw up if not done correctly. Muscles can become inflamed and damaged when stretched too aggressively. Luckily, a few simple rules help keep us safe and flexible. When stretching, we want to apply purely passive tension for 30 seconds while avoiding pain.

Unlike SMR, static stretching should not cause any significant discomfort. For a muscle to be lengthened safely and effectively, it needs to be relaxed so passive tension can build. When we stretch too hard, muscle fibers have a difficult time relaxing and end up fighting the lengthening process with an isometric contraction. If passive tension is the goal, we can’t be actively contracting against it. Keep the intensity of your static stretching high enough to build noticeable tension, but far from pain.

I recommend that you stick to a hold time of 30 seconds per stretch, perform 2-3 sets per muscle, and alternate between sides by stretching unilaterally. Alternatively, you can knock out all sets for a single muscle before moving on to another like with SMR. Rest for 5-10 seconds between bouts if you perform all sets on one side consecutively. Experiment with both for the best results.

How much range of motion should a joint have? It depends. Age, sex, muscle mass, and the specific demands of your individual lifestyle will determine how much flexibility you need as well as the practical upper limits of your range of motion. With that said, tight muscles need to be stretched and lengthened to promote longer lasting adaptations and achieve optimal joint function. If something is noticeably tight and impedes your ability to move through a specific exercise, work on it. For those who are already flexible, focus on stretching maintenance rather than continued improvement.

Like all other aspects of fitness, our flexibility goals aren’t accomplished in a single session. Improvements take time. Stretch to a comfortable range of motion and slowly work to increase it over days, weeks, and months. Do what’s best for you.

Cool Down Example

The following is a simplified cool down routine that follows a lower body workout. Because post-workout stretching only targets the muscles worked that day, the included example isolates the quadriceps, hamstrings, and glutes.

As seen above, the self-myofascial release section targets each muscle individually in a unilateral fashion, each for two sets of 30 seconds. The same unilateral approach is applied to static stretching. A wall supported standing quad stretch starts things out, followed by a band assisted supine hamstring stretch, and pigeon pose targets the glutes to wrap everything up. If possible, take the time to isolate each muscle unilaterally as performed above. This approach takes a bit longer than a bilateral method, but it helps identify imbalances much easier. Bilateral stretching can be just as effective and is more time efficient, but don’t do it exclusively. 30 second durations are listed in this example, but feel free to play within a 30-60 second window for both SMR and static stretching. Finally, be sure to breathe normally while under tension. Don’t hold your breath or hyperventilate.

Because we want to stretch all of the primary movers used in a workout, tissues that carry you through any cardiovascular conditioning need love too. If your upper body workout ends with sprint intervals, you’ll want to stretch out your chest and shoulders, as well as your glutes, quads, hamstrings, and calves. Make sure all the muscles worked in your session get some attention at the end.

Our bodies use so many different muscles and joint angles to move, so I can’t cover every possible stretch you might need. But I can suggest a few that cover the most basic movement patterns.

The stretches above should serve as a helpful introduction to static stretching and target some of the most necessary areas, but it’s a very basic list. You will most likely need to incorporate a few extras for your individual needs. If you have the ability to supplement your weight training routine with regular yoga classes, do them. Get out of the weight room and learn something new.

SMR & Static Stretching For Off-Days

Self-myofascial release and static stretching can be performed on non-training days, depending on your goals and recovery needs. Research suggests that to increase flexibility, reduce soreness, and create longer lasting physiological adaptations, stretching and SMR need to be performed at regular intervals throughout the week. But it’s not always necessary to include both cool down components.

To reduce soreness and inflammation, incorporate SMR into your off-days to promote blood flow and general recovery, but leave static stretching out. Static stretching has little to no benefit on DOMS and can potentially exacerbate muscle damage. If you’re flexible but really sore, save static stretching for the cool down after a workout. Off-day SMR uses the same massage technique covered earlier, but the duration is a bit longer.

I recommend you increase the total set count to three and bump up the rolling time to 90 seconds per round. These sessions can be performed at any time during the day, but may be most effective if added into your morning routine or knocked out before bed. Feel free to SMR daily, but treat this recovery tool like a workout and limit its application to 1-2 times per day.

If flexibility is your goal, both SMR and static stretching should be utilized. Tighter muscles require more frequent attention and may need to be massaged and stretched 4-6 times (including cool down stretching sessions) per week until a desired range of motion is met. Like off-day SMR, static stretching for non-training days uses the same application style described earlier, but the total time is increased.

After completing the non-negotiable, off-day SMR protocol (3X90 sec), stretch each muscle 3-4 times for 30-60 seconds. Stay far away from muscular pain and discomfort. Once you’ve achieved your flexibility goals, static stretching volume can be reduced to a maintenance frequency of 2-3 times per week, or kept within the cool down after lifting.

PNF Versus Static Stretching

Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching is another extremely effective stretching method that can replace or supplement static stretching. PNF stretching utilizes the same autogenic inhibition response as self-myofascial release, but is performed during a static stretch.

I suggest a hold-relax approach that uses a five second isometric contraction at 40-90% of maximum force, followed by a 30 second stretch, performed for 2-4 sets, with a 5-10 second break between rounds. Feel free to mix PNF in with your current static stretching sets or eliminate static stretching completely and perform PNF exclusively.

Final Thoughts

Lift all the weights. Run all the miles. Stretch all the muscles.

Regardless of your programming or long-term goals, make sure your routine includes a post-workout cool down section. A few minutes of work can make a massive difference in your overall exercise progress.

A decent amount of content was covered in this chapter, but hopefully the overall message is clear. After you’re done working out, perform self-myofascial release with a tool of your choice, then do some static stretching. Nothing too complicated or crazy. Don’t overthink it.

Experiment by manipulating different variables. Find what works best for you. Share what you discover. Have fun.

References

Apostolopoulos, N., Metsios, G. S., Flouris, A. D., Koutedakis, Y., & Wyon, M. A. (2015). The relevance of stretch intensity and position-a systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1128.

Bandy, W. D., & Irion, J. M. (1994). The Effect of Time on Static Stretch on the Flexibility of the Hamstring Muscles. Physical Therapy, 74(9), 845–850.

Baxter, C., Mc Naughton, L. R., Sparks, A., Norton, L., & Bentley, D. (2016). Impact of stretching on the performance and injury risk of long-distance runners. Research in Sports Medicine, 25(1), 78–90.

Beardsley, C. (2018). Strength & Conditioning Research. Retrieved from https://www.strengthandconditioningresearch.com/

Beardsley, C., & Škarabot, J. (2015). Effects of self-myofascial release: A systematic review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 19(4), 747–758.

Beckers, D., Adler, S., & Buck, M. (2008). PNF in Practice (3rd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.

Blazevich, A. J., Cannavan, D., Waugh, C. M., Miller, S. C., Thorlund, J. B., Aagaard, P., & Kay, A. D. (2014). Range of motion, neuromechanical, and architectural adaptations to plantar flexor stretch training in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology, 117(5), 452–462.

Brughelli, M., & Cronin, J. (2007). Altering the Length-Tension Relationship with Eccentric Exercise. Sports Medicine, 37(9), 807–826.

Brynnel, A., Hernandez, Y., Kiss, B., Lindqvist, J., Adler, M., Kolb, J., van der Pijl, R., Gohlke, J., Strom, J., Smith, J., Ottenheijm, C., … Granzier, H. L. (2018). Downsizing the molecular spring of the giant protein titin reveals that skeletal muscle titin determines passive stiffness and drives longitudinal hypertrophy. eLife, 7, e40532.

Burkholder T. J. (2007). Mechanotransduction in skeletal muscle. Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library, 12, 174-91.

Cayco, C. S., Labro, A. V., & Gorgon, E. J. R. (2018). Hold-relax and contract-relax stretching for hamstrings flexibility: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Physical Therapy in Sport.

Cheatham, S. W., Kolber, M. J., Cain, M., & Lee, M. (2015). THE EFFECTS OF SELF-MYOFASCIAL RELEASE USING A FOAM ROLL OR ROLLER MASSAGER ON JOINT RANGE OF MOTION, MUSCLE RECOVERY, AND PERFORMANCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. International journal of sports physical therapy, 10(6), 827-38.

Cheatham, S. W., Kolber, M. J., & Cain, M. (2017). COMPARISON OF VIDEO-GUIDED, LIVE INSTRUCTED, AND SELF-GUIDED FOAM ROLL INTERVENTIONS ON KNEE JOINT RANGE OF MOTION AND PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLD: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. International journal of sports physical therapy, 12(2), 242-249.

Cheatham, S. W., Stull, K. R., & Kolber, M. J. (2018). Roller massage: is the numeric pain rating scale a reliable measurement and can it direct individuals with no experience to a specific roller density?. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 62(3), 161-169.

Cheung, K., Hume, P. A., & Maxwell, L. (2003). Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness. Sports Medicine, 33(2), 145–164.

Cristopoliski, F., Barela, J. A., Leite, N., Fowler, N. E., & Rodacki, A. L. F. (2009). Stretching Exercise Program Improves Gait in the Elderly. Gerontology, 55(6), 614–620.

DuVall, M. M., Jinha, A., Schappacher-Tilp, G., Leonard, T. R., & Herzog, W. (2017). Differences in titin segmental elongation between passive and active stretch in skeletal muscle. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 220(23), 4418–4425.

GOLDSPINK, G. (1999). Changes in muscle mass and phenotype and the expression of autocrine and systemic growth factors by muscle in response to stretch and overload. Journal of Anatomy, 194(3), 323–334.

Heidlauf, T., Klotz, T., Rode, C., Siebert, T., & Röhrle, O. (2017). A continuum-mechanical skeletal muscle model including actin-titin interaction predicts stable contractions on the descending limb of the force-length relation. PLoS computational biology, 13(10), e1005773.

Hornberger, T. A., Armstrong, D. D., Koh, T. J., Burkholder, T. J., & Esser, K. A. (2005). Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, 288(1), C185–C194.

Hotfiel, T., Freiwald, J., Hoppe, M., Lutter, C., Forst, R., Grim, C., … Heiss, R. (2018). Advances in Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS): Part I: Pathogenesis and Diagnostics. Sportverletzung · Sportschaden, 32(04), 243–250.

Knight, C.A., Rutledge, C.R., Cox, M.E., et al. (2001). Effect of Superficial Heat, Deep Heat, and Active Exercise Warm-up on the Extensibility of the Plantar Flexors. Physical Therapy.

Kruse, N. T., Silette, C. R., & Scheuermann, B. W. (2016). Influence of passive stretch on muscle blood flow, oxygenation and central cardiovascular responses in healthy young males. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 310(9), H1210–H1221.

Kwak, D. H., & Ryu, Y. U. (2015). Applying proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching: optimal contraction intensity to attain the maximum increase in range of motion in young males. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 27(7).

Lempke, L., Wilkinson, R., Murray, C., & Stanek, J. (2018). The Effectiveness of PNF Versus Static Stretching on Increasing Hip-Flexion Range of Motion. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 27(3), 289–294.

MacDonald, G. Z., Button, D. C., Drinkwater, E. J., & Behm, D. G. (2014). Foam Rolling as a Recovery Tool after an Intense Bout of Physical Activity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 46(1), 131–142.

Macgregor, L. J., Fairweather, M. M., Bennett, R. M., & Hunter, A. M. (2018). The Effect of Foam Rolling for Three Consecutive Days on Muscular Efficiency and Range of Motion. Sports medicine – open, 4(1), 26.

Martins, Wagner & MM, Carvalho & Mota, Márcio & GFB, Cipriano & FAS, Mendes & Diniz, Leonardo & Júnior, Gerson & Carregaro, Rodrigo & JLQ, Durigan. (2013). Diacutaneous fibrolysis versus passive stretching after articular immobilization: Muscle recovery and extracellular matrix remodelling. OA Medical Hypothesis. 1. 17.

Mohr, A. R., Long, B. C., & Goad, C. L. (2014). Effect of Foam Rolling and Static Stretching on Passive Hip-Flexion Range of Motion. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 23(4), 296–299.

Monteiro, E. R., & Neto, V. G. (2016). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOAM ROLLING VOLUMES ON KNEE EXTENSION FATIGUE. International journal of sports physical therapy, 11(7), 1076-1081.

Monteiro, E. R., Vigotsky, A. D., Novaes, J., & Škarabot, J. (2018). ACUTE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ANTERIOR THIGH SELF-MASSAGE ON HIP RANGE-OF-MOTION IN TRAINED MEN. International journal of sports physical therapy, 13(1), 104–113.

Murray, A. M., Jones, T. W., Horobeanu, C., Turner, A. P., & Sproule, J. (2016). SIXTY SECONDS OF FOAM ROLLING DOES NOT AFFECT FUNCTIONAL FLEXIBILITY OR CHANGE MUSCLE TEMPERATURE IN ADOLESCENT ATHLETES. International journal of sports physical therapy, 11(5), 765-776.

Page P. (2012). Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation. International journal of sports physical therapy, 7(1), 109-19.

Pearcey, G. E. P., Bradbury-Squires, D. J., Kawamoto, J.-E., Drinkwater, E. J., Behm, D. G., & Button, D. C. (2015). Foam Rolling for Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness and Recovery of Dynamic Performance Measures. Journal of Athletic Training, 50(1), 5–13.

Romero-Moraleda, B., La Touche, R., Lerma-Lara, S., Ferrer-Peña, R., Paredes, V., Peinado, A. B., & Muñoz-García, D. (2017). Neurodynamic mobilization and foam rolling improved delayed-onset muscle soreness in a healthy adult population: a randomized controlled clinical trial. PeerJ, 5, e3908.

Sands, W. A., McNeal, J. R., Murray, S. R., Ramsey, M. W., Sato, K., Mizuguchi, S., & Stone, M. H. (2013). Stretching and Its Effects on Recovery. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 35(5), 30–36.

Sharman, M. J., Cresswell, A. G., & Riek, S. (2006). Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching. Sports Medicine, 36(11), 929–939.

Simpson, C. L., Kim, B. D. H., Bourcet, M. R., Jones, G. R., & Jakobi, J. M. (2017). Stretch training induces unequal adaptation in muscle fascicles and thickness in medial and lateral gastrocnemii. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 27(12), 1597–1604.

Su, H., Chang, N.-J., Wu, W.-L., Guo, L.-Y., & Chu, I.-H. (2017). Acute Effects of Foam Rolling, Static Stretching, and Dynamic Stretching During Warm-ups on Muscular Flexibility and Strength in Young Adults. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 26(6), 469–477.

Weerapong, P., Hume, P. A., & Kolt, G. S. (2004). Stretching: Mechanisms and Benefits for Sport Performance and Injury Prevention. Physical Therapy Reviews, 9(4), 189–206.

Weppler, C. H., & Magnusson, S. P. (2010). Increasing Muscle Extensibility: A Matter of Increasing Length or Modifying Sensation? Physical Therapy, 90(3), 438–449.

Wyon, M. A., Smith, A., & Koutedakis, Y. (2013). A Comparison of Strength and Stretch Interventions on Active and Passive Ranges of Movement in Dancers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 27(11), 3053–3059.

Zöllner, A. M., Abilez, O. J., Böl, M., & Kuhl, E. (2012). Stretching skeletal muscle: chronic muscle lengthening through sarcomerogenesis. PloS one, 7(10), e45661.

The post Cool Down: Stretching & SMR appeared first on Fitstra.

Warm Up: Heat & Movement

Samuel Stephens — Wed, 01 Jan 2025 21:30:49 +0000

Get the Full Book

This guide is one chapter from Fitness & Nutrition Programming for Beginners. If you enjoy reading it, consider purchasing the full book either as a PDF or paperback. Thanks!

Warm Up: Heat & Movement

The exercise performance benefits of warming up and how to build an effective routine.

Thermodynamic Gains

After a long day spent hunched over a keyboard at the office, you get in your car and navigate through traffic to the gym. A few minutes after arriving, you quickly change clothes and immediately load up the bar with a new one rep squat max. You brace under the bar, lift off, then… die?

Beginning a high-intensity workout without a proper warm up is generally accepted as a bad idea from both a safety and a performance perspective. The previous squat disaster is an extreme example, but the necessity of an effective warm up doesn’t change among various types of exercises.

Whether you’re going for an easy run or setting a new personal best in your favorite lift, taking the time to ready your body before you start will result in a significantly more productive workout. To lift more weight, build more muscle, and lose more fat, we need to warm up.

This chapter defines warm up, covers the benefits of an effective warm up, and discusses how to build your own routine to get the most out of your workouts.

Warm Up Definition & Benefits

A warm up is a brief (10-15 min) and easy exercise routine that occurs before the main workout. This short preparation period readies us for the day’s session by increasing body temperature, boosting blood flow, and priming neuromuscular pathways. The warm up is not a time to treat injuries or perform significant amounts of corrective exercise. Do rehab work on off-days or between sessions.

An effective warm up can be designed in a variety of ways, but all methods should emphasize heat (an internal body temperature increase of at least 1 °C) and movement.

Warm up research primarily focuses on two different styles of warm up, passive and active. A passive warm up raises body temperature by external means (heavy clothing or a hot bath), while an active warm up increases heart rate, blood flow, and heat through exercise. Both of these modalities have been shown to positively affect physical performance and can be accomplished simultaneously.

Some of the most significant combined benefits of active and passive warm ups include –

Increased ATP turnover rate (faster energy production)
Increased ATP utilization in individual muscle fibers (greater muscular performance)
Increased contraction speed (greater muscular power)
Increased O2 uptake (improved endurance and fat loss)
Decreased lactate accumulation
Increased range of motion
Increased contraction consistency
Decreased risk of injury
Decreased joint friction
Decreased time to reach steady state heart rate
Increased focus and self-confidence
Increased motor unit recruitment

In a resistance training setting, these benefits can result in faster muscle growth, improved strength, and increased muscular endurance. For cardio focused sessions, warming up helps us burn more fat, improves our overall conditioning, and allows us to settle into a steady state heart rate sooner. Bigger and stronger muscles, faster and leaner bodies, and a decreased risk of injury. There are too many great things to pass up. We need heat and movement.

Thanks to the thermodynamic products of catabolic reactions, exercise makes us hot and sweaty. This unavoidable result of moderate to high-intensity movement means that we can focus entirely on the style, duration, and intensity of the active warm up and gain the passive benefits. This cause and effect relationship between movement and heat is the foundation of the warm up.

Building The Warm Up

Below is a basic warm up outline built from a mixture of studies that cover heat, exercise intensity, duration, and self-myofascial release.

To quickly summarize the overall concept, we want to wake up the body then practice the movement patterns that will be performed in the upcoming workout. The wake up phase increases our core body temperature through cardio. The practice phase incorporates exercises that mirror the intensity and activities of the day’s session. These two parts are more commonly referred to as general (wake up) and specific (practice).

As shown above, the general section has distinct, separate parts, while the specific half is a mixture of dynamic stretching and plyometric exercises that gradually become the workout. This is designed to maximize transition efficiency and maintain as much heat as possible from the warm up to the workout. From start to finish, this routine takes roughly 10-15 minutes. You’ll be slightly out of breath and a little sweaty when it’s done but full of energy for the work ahead.

Let’s dive a little deeper into the general and specific sections before looking at full warm up examples. How do these warm up components make us better?

Warm Up Structure: General

The general section of the warm up takes roughly 8-10 minutes to complete and consists of self-myofascial release and cardiovascular exercise.

Self-myofascial release (SMR) is the first part of the warm up and can be accomplished using a variety of tools, but we’re going to focus specifically on the foam roller. Studies have shown that pre-exercise foam rolling can acutely increase flexibility, blood flow, and neuromuscular efficiency without causing any of the negative effects associated with static stretching. This means foam rolling boosts our range of motion while maintaining strength, helps deliver more nutrient-carrying blood to muscles, and may lower the motor unit recruitment thresholds for type 2 fibers. All of this can lead to more productive workouts.

Compared to longer SMR sessions after a workout or on recovery days, foam rolling during the warm up should only take a few minutes to complete. Warm up SMR should focus primarily on the antagonistic pairs (opposing muscles in a joint/movement) being worked that day. However, if you aren’t in a rush to get started and want to focus on rolling out your whole body, go for it. Take this time to think about your intent and goals for the day.

The table above is an example SMR routine that could take place before a day of pressing exercises like bench press or overhead press. The total time is calculated from one 30 second rolling bout per major muscle.

The second part of the general warm up is the cardiovascular portion. This section is designed to warm up the body through a cardio-based activity and lasts 5-6 minutes. Light cardiovascular exercise is a great way to increase blood flow, prepare us mentally for the upcoming session, generate heat, and prime the energy systems we’ll be using later. We get a lot in return for a relatively small expenditure of energy.

Because most resistance training workouts utilize a mixture of fuel sources, we want the general cardio section to utilize our ATP-CP, glycolytic, and aerobic energy systems, while raising body temperature. This can be accomplished by combining an easy aerobic base with a short, high-intensity anaerobic finish. We can passively generate heat and mimic upcoming energy requirements without causing major fatigue. The time you spend in each of these two zones will vary depending on your workout, but about 80-90% should be in an easy to moderate zone with the last 10-20% at a higher intensity.

You’re free to pick whatever modalities you like, but I recommend running and jogging. You like to run? Great. Is cycling more your thing? Go for it. As long as you can adhere to the basic duration and intensity structure, feel free to experiment with different exercise types.

Above is an example cardio structure that can be performed before a session of resistance training. The total time spent on the treadmill is 5.5 minutes. The aerobic section at the beginning increases body temperature and the anaerobic portion activates anaerobic glycolysis and some higher threshold motor units.

In this example scenario, the five aerobic minutes are completed at roughly a 4/10 intensity and the sprint finish is performed at 7+/10. For most people, this is a moderate jog that transitions into a fast run. If you can’t maintain an easy jog during your warm up, don’t stress out about it. However, you need to work towards it. This general outline can be used with different fitness levels and scales to fit any user. On the treadmill, a more fit runner has the ability to crank up both belt speed and incline, while someone less experienced may want to walk at a constant pace and raise the incline to achieve similar energy demands. Do what’s best for you.

The main takeaway here is this general outline can be modified and adapted to your needs. There’s no single, perfect warm up protocol. Lots of different variations can be effective. Feel free to experiment with times, durations, and intensities within the suggested parameters outlined above. If you can boost blood circulation, increase core body temperature, keep it within a 5-8 minute window, and feel energetic afterwards, great.

If you’re in a cold gym or live in a cooler climate, wear a light jacket and/or pants during your warm up to help speed up the heating process and maintain higher body temperatures. You’ve worked hard enough to sweat. Don’t let air conditioning or cooler weather negatively affect your efforts.

Now that we’re warm, sweaty, and ready to exercise, let’s look at the specific warm up portion.

Warm Up Structure: Specific

You can perform the same general warm up before every session, but the specific warm up changes to reflect daily demands. The specific warm up consists of dynamic stretching and plyometric exercises of increasing intensity. This section should take 4-6 minutes to complete.

Dynamic stretching is the first component of the specific warm up. Dynamic stretching is a warm up technique that prepares us for the workload ahead. It does this by introducing moderate loads to muscles, boosting blood flow, increasing joint lubrication, and avoiding fatigue. Dynamic stretches are performed with low-intensity movements and light exercises. These stretches typically use our own bodyweight, safely introduce resistance to our muscles, and take our joints through full ranges of motion. Compound movements that require core activation like push-ups, ring rows, and air squats are great examples. Dynamic stretches should be easy to perform and use a rep pace that’s the same or just barely slower than your normal speed. The exact rep count depends on your experience and ability, but most people should aim to complete 5-10 reps per exercise for 2-3 sets.

Plyometrics are the second component of the specific warm up, and are included to boost the efficiency of neuromuscular activity. These are low-load, high-velocity, power-based exercises that result in quick stretch-shorten cycles of muscles. Plyometrics should be performed with a high (90+%) intensity, light weight, maintain a low rep count (4-6), operate within a 2-3 set total, and not induce fatigue. Similar to dynamic stretching, plyometric movements should ideally incorporate bodyweight exercises like squat jumps, plyo push-ups, kettlebell swings, kipping pull-ups, explosive wall balls, etc. Fast, explosive, and light weight stuff.

Because a nearly instantaneous stretch-shorten cycle is the primary defining characteristic of plyometrics, all chosen movements should start with the targeted muscles in a contracted/shortened state. For example, an explosive ring row would begin at the top of the row with arms bent. Jump squats begin standing completely upright. Plyo push-ups start at the top with arms extended. Some examples of plyometric exercises for common movement

Without diving too far into the science, performing plyometrics before a workout allows us to utilize post-activation potentiation (PAP). PAP is a theory that basically states our muscles remember how much fiber activation was recently required, and this makes them more likely to recruit at least the same amount of motor units during subsequent, less demanding activities. Post-activation potentiation can result in increased fiber recruitment towards the beginning of a set, greater strength output, and more volume completed under heavy loads.

For example, a max effort squat jump doesn’t load our muscles with a ton of weight, but it does require 100% motor unit recruitment. When performed before a heavy barbell squat, the jumps prime our neuromuscular pathways, create a short-term contractile history, and make the motor neurons involved easily excitable due to their recent activation. Performing one exercise that mimics the motor unit recruitment requirements of another essentially lowers motor unit thresholds by decreasing the stimulation needed to create action potentials. Post-activation potentiation is what makes moderate weight feel unexpectedly light when performed after a heavy set.

Studies have shown that this muscular response works with both high-speed, low-resistance (plyo push-up to improve bench press) and low-speed, high-resistance (heavy squat to improve sprint time) efforts. More research needs to be done on PAP to fully understand it but enough studies suggest it’s too effective to ignore.

The final phase of the specific warm up is the transition into the actual workout.

As we gradually progress through dynamic stretching and plyometrics, we can incorporate increasingly heavier sets of the starting exercise until we reach our first working set. The example below highlights one way to lead up to a day of squatting.

As seen in the table above, the session begins with dynamic stretching in the form of walking lunges, adds in squat jump plyometrics, then phases out stretching and plyo activities as the barbell work is incorporated. Rest time is kept to a minimum until heavier working loads are reached. Dynamic stretching and plyometric work are performed for 2-3 sets each. The final exercise on the list is the first working set of the day.

Let’s put both sections together and look at two full warm up examples.

Complete Warm Up Examples

The example below is designed to work with a hypertrophy or strength focused pressing workout that leads up to bench press. The general and specific sections are combined.

This warm up heats up the body, activates energy systems, primes neuromuscular pathways, and introduces resistance to our chest, shoulders, and triceps. All of this leads to the first set of bench press. Reps for regular push-ups and plyo push-ups are kept far from failure. The first bench press working set starts with six reps of 185 lbs, so the weight increases based on that end goal. Keep the rep counts of your ramping loads roughly the same as the first working set.

The loads of your first working sets will require their own unique ramping speeds. All working sets need to be progressively introduced as you transition from exercise to exercise. This means that you should perform some type of warm up or ramping load progression when you start a new exercise during your workout. For example, after finishing bench press, don’t immediately start your first working set on overhead press. You don’t need to perform the full warm up routine again, but 1-2 sets of plyometrics staggered between 1-2 ramping loads is recommended. This is much more important when transitioning from one muscle group to another, like moving from chest to back.

Because pre-exercise prep is not limited to resistance training, let’s switch gears and look at a running warm up.

The general warm up starts by rolling out our lower limbs then slowly takes us from an easy jog to our normal running pace over the course of five minutes. This aerobic progression should increase our metabolic efficiency of fats and make the session easier. This pre-run routine does not contain any anaerobic cardio because the long run doesn’t include sprinting or high-intensity exercise. However, a quick anaerobic finish shouldn’t negatively affect the run if time is dialed in correctly.

The specific warm up follows the same formula as the bench press example, and contains minimally fatiguing dynamic and plyo-based exercises. The muscular demands of cardiovascular exercise aren’t the same as resistance training, but we still want our muscles to be warm. Unlike the bench press example, this outline doesn’t have a first working set to ramp up to. Instead, we rest for a few minutes after completing all dynamic and plyometric movements before starting the run.

We could spend all day covering every possible workout scenario and the different warm ups that accompany them, but I’m going to stop with these two. The framework provided in this chapter should allow you to easily build your own. Don’t overthink it.

Static Stretching?

I don’t recommend any static stretching before or during a workout.

Although there is conflicting research regarding the effectiveness and safety of static stretching prior to exercise, there are too many studies that show a negative effect on performance. If you’re so tight that foam rolling and dynamic warm up exercises have little to no impact on your range of motion, it may be best to shift your fitness priorities for that day. Consider taking some time off to work on mobility and recovery.

However, if your current warm up routine does include some static stretching, don’t cut it out immediately. Dropping it all at once might screw with your pre-session confidence. Slowly phase it out over the course of a few weeks. Reduce the duration of each stretch by a few seconds each time it’s performed until you reach zero. But if absolutely no convincing will change your mind about warm up static stretching and you have to do it to feel fully prepared for a session, cap each segment duration at 10-15 seconds and stay away from pain or any muscular discomfort. Stretching for less than 30 seconds shouldn’t have a negative impact on exercise performance.

Static stretching is an important part of any good routine, but needs to be implemented at the right time.

Final Thoughts

You might be thinking that this was a complicated way to say you should do cardio and some light exercises before a workout. You’re probably right. But at least now you know how an effective warm up contributes to exercise performance, have an outline to help you design your own, and may have learned something new along the way.

Foam roll. Cardio. Dynamic stretching. Plyometrics. Workout. Pretty easy, right?

Experiment by manipulating different variables. Find what works best for you. Share what you discover. Have fun.

References

Baechle, T. R., & Earle, R. W. (2008). Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Baxter, C., Naughton, L. R., Sparks, A., Norton, L., & Bentley, D. (2016). Impact of stretching on the performance and injury risk of long-distance runners. Research in Sports Medicine, 25(1), 78-90.

Beardsley, C., & Škarabot, J. (2015). Effects of self-myofascial release: A systematic review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 19(4), 747–758.

Behrens, M., Mau-Moeller, A., Mueller, K., Heise, S., Gube, M., Beuster, N., … Bruhn, S. (2016). Plyometric training improves voluntary activation and strength during isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 19(2), 170–176.

Bishop, David John. (2003). Warm Up I: Potential Mechanisms and the Effects of Passive Warm Up on Exercise Performance. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 33. 439-54.

Bradbury-Squires, D. J., Noftall, J. C., Sullivan, K. M., Behm, D. G., Power, K. E., & Button, D. C. (2015). Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge. Journal of athletic training, 50(2), 133-40.

Brunner-Ziegler, S., Strasser, B., & Haber, P. (2011). Comparison of Metabolic and Biomechanic Responses to Active vs. Passive Warm-up Procedures before Physical Exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(4), 909–914.

Chaouachi, A., Castagna, C., Chtara, M., Brughelli, M., Turki, O., Galy, O., … Behm, D. G. (2010). Effect of Warm-Ups Involving Static or Dynamic Stretching on Agility, Sprinting, and Jumping Performance in Trained Individuals. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(8), 2001–2011.

Cheatham, S.W., Kolber, M.J., Cain, M., & Lee, M.C. (2015). The Effects of Self-myofascial Release Using a Foam Roll or Roller Massager on Joint Range of Motion, Muscle Recovery, and Performance: a Systematic Review. International journal of sports physical therapy, 10 6, 827-38.

CRAMER, J. T., HOUSH, T. J., JOHNSON, G. O., MILLER, J. M., COBURN, J. W., & BECK, T. W. (2004). ACUTE EFFECTS OF STATIC STRETCHING ON PEAK TORQUE IN WOMEN. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(2), 236–241.

Davies, G., Riemann, B. L., & Manske, R. (2015). CURRENT CONCEPTS OF PLYOMETRIC EXERCISE. International journal of sports physical therapy, 10(6), 760-86.

Harwood, B., & Rice, C. L. (2012). Changes in motor unit recruitment thresholds of the human anconeus muscle during torque development preceding shortening elbow extensions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107(10), 2876–2884.

Jankowski, C. M. (2008). Dynamic Warm-Up Protocols, With and Without a Weighted Vest, and Fitness Performance in High School Female Athletes. Yearbook of Sports Medicine, 2008, 74–75.

KAY, A. D., & BLAZEVICH, A. J. (2012). Effect of Acute Static Stretch on Maximal Muscle Performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44(1), 154–164.

Lorenz D. (2011). Postactivation potentiation: an introduction. International journal of sports physical therapy, 6(3), 234-40.

McGowan, C. J., Pyne, D. B., Thompson, K. G., & Rattray, B. (2015). Warm-Up Strategies for Sport and Exercise: Mechanisms and Applications. Sports Medicine, 45(11), 1523–1546.

Miranda, H., Maia, M. de F., Paz, G. A., & Costa, P. B. (2015). Acute Effects of Antagonist Static Stretching in the Inter-Set Rest Period on Repetition Performance and Muscle Activation. Research in Sports Medicine, 23(1), 37–50.

McCrary JM, Ackermann BJ, Halaki M A systematic review of the effects of upper body warm-up on performance and injury Br J Sports Med 2015;49:935-942.

Monteiro, E. R., & Neto, V. G. (2016). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOAM ROLLING VOLUMES ON KNEE EXTENSION FATIGUE. International journal of sports physical therapy, 11(7), 1076-1081.

NAKAMURA, K., KODAMA, T., & SUZUKI, S. (2012). Effects of Active Individual Muscle Stretching on Muscle Function. Rigakuryoho Kagaku, 27(6), 687–691.

Page, P. (2012). CURRENT CONCEPTS IN MUSCLE STRETCHING FOR EXERCISE AND REHABILITATION. Int J Sports Phys Ther., 7(1), 109-119.

Park, H. K., Jung, M. K., Park, E., Lee, C. Y., Jee, Y. S., Eun, D., Cha, J. Y., … Yoo, J. (2018). The effect of warm-ups with stretching on the isokinetic moments of collegiate men. Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 14(1), 78-82. doi:10.12965/jer.1835210.605

Piazzesi, G., Reconditi, M., Linari, M., Lucii, L., Bianco, P., Brunello, E., … Lombardi, V. (2007). Skeletal Muscle Performance Determined by Modulation of Number of Myosin Motors Rather Than Motor Force or Stroke Size. Cell, 131(4), 784–795.

Schoenfeld, B. (2017, August 20). Warming Up Prior to Resistance Training: An Excerpt from “Strong & Sculpted”. Retrieved from https://www.lookgreatnaked.com/blog/warming-up-prior-to-resistance-training-an-excerpt-from-strong-sculpted/

Schroeder, A. N., & Best, T. M. (2015). Is Self Myofascial Release an Effective Preexercise and Recovery Strategy? A Literature Review. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 14(3), 200–208.

Sim, Y.-J., Byun, Y.-H., & Yoo, J. (2015). Comparison of isokinetic muscle strength and muscle power by types of warm-up. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 27(5), 1491–1494.

Slimani, M., Chamari, K., Miarka, B., Del Vecchio, F. B., & Chéour, F. (2016). Effects of Plyometric Training on Physical Fitness in Team Sport Athletes: A Systematic Review. Journal of human kinetics, 53, 231–247.

Smith, C. A. (1994). The Warm-Up Procedure: To Stretch or Not to Stretch. A Brief Review. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 19(1), 12–17.

Sullivan, K. M., Silvey, D. B., Button, D. C., & Behm, D. G. (2013). Roller-massager application to the hamstrings increases sit-and-reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments. International journal of sports physical therapy, 8(3), 228-36.

Tamer T. M. (2013). Hyaluronan and synovial joint: function, distribution and healing. Interdisciplinary toxicology, 6(3), 111-25.

Thorborg, K., Krommes, K. K., Esteve, E., Clausen, M. B., Bartels, E. M., & Rathleff, M. S. (2017). Effect of specific exercise-based football injury prevention programmes on the overall injury rate in football: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the FIFA 11 and 11+ programmes. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(7), 562–571.

The post Warm Up: Heat & Movement appeared first on Fitstra.

Cardio: Fat Loss & Work Capacity

Samuel Stephens — Tue, 31 Dec 2024 21:07:53 +0000

Get the Full Book

This guide is one chapter from Fitness & Nutrition Programming for Beginners. If you enjoy reading it, consider purchasing the full book either as a PDF or paperback. Thanks!

Cardio: Fat Loss & Work Capacity

How to lose weight through cardiovascular exercise and an easy to follow, research-based guide for fat loss programming.

Breathe In. Breathe Out.

There’s no single best way to lose weight, but some methods are more effective than others.

The Fitstra fat loss strategy relies on customized cardiovascular exercise that uses unique metabolic markers to create personalized workouts, and these sessions are designed to supplement an existing resistance training program. That’s a mouthful. Basically, I encourage everyone to add a little extra cardio to their current weight training routine. By looking at the science of fat loss, we can build exercise programs that provide realistic, sustainable, and healthy solutions to weight management regardless of age, sex, or exercise experience.

Because fat loss is primarily achieved through cardio within the context of exercise, this chapter focuses on the importance of breathing, assessing one’s own conditioning level, and burning the most amount of fat through aerobic and anaerobic exercise.

The following content will help you design an effective fat loss-cardio plan that can be added to any existing resistance training routine.

Registered Dietitians & Fat Loss

Before we get started, it’s important to stress the influence diet has on weight loss. Research shows that we can lose body fat through exercise alone, but a smart diet combined with physical activity significantly increases our rate of loss. This means you’ll be at a massive disadvantage if you don’t eat correctly. But what’s correct?

Effective diets vary from person to person, but all should promote healthy and sustainable weight loss progress, provide enough energy to easily perform daily activities, and allow us to live a normal life. We don’t want to be controlled by restrictive eating habits.

I recommend working with a registered dietitian (RD) during your weight loss process. The advice and detailed information you’ll receive from a qualified nutrition professional will be incredibly beneficial to your progress and overall health.

The Process of Fat Loss

After a month of hard work and self control, you’ve accomplished your goal and lost five pounds. By using a bioelectrical impedance scale to measure body fat percentage, you’re confident the loss in weight was almost all fat. Awesome. There’s now less of you than before. But where did those unwanted pounds go?

When our bodies use stored fat as a fuel source, triglycerides in fat cells are first broken down into free fatty acids (FFA) through a process called lipolysis. FFAs are then moved out of fat cells and eventually make their way into the mitochondria of muscles to be turned into energy (ATP) through beta oxidation. This oxygen dependent (aerobic) process of metabolizing fats into ATP produces water and carbon dioxide as a byproduct. From those five pounds of fat lost, 4.2 lbs (84%) of them were exhaled as carbon dioxide and the remaining 0.8 lbs (16%) were lost as water in urine and sweat. Through hard work and consistency, you converted solid fat into liquid and gas.

The stoichiometric formula for the oxidation of a common FFA is listed above. Notice that in order for the reaction to take place, oxygen must be present. Using this information, we can calculate that the oxidation of five pounds of fat requires us to breathe in almost 15 pounds of oxygen. Based on this sizable quantity of O2, it’s clear that our ability to burn fat is heavily tied to how well we can breathe and the efficiency of our aerobic energy system.

This means we should do intense cardio to breathe harder, right?

One small issue we face when programming for weight loss is our metabolic response to exercise intensity. As we workout harder and our heart rates increase beyond a certain point, we essentially stop using oxygen for energy metabolism and burn less fat despite a higher per minute caloric expenditure. High-intensity exercise like 200m sprints require a rapid fuel delivery system to maintain a constant supply of ATP to our muscles, faster than what fat oxidation can offer. Carbohydrates provide less energy than fats, but glucose and stored glycogen can be broken down almost immediately because they do not require oxygen to be metabolized. This metabolic pathway for carbohydrates is called anaerobic glycolysis.

Although we burn very little fat at higher intensities, a great fat loss program will utilize both low and high-intensity cardiovascular exercise and their corresponding fuel sources. But what cardiovascular exercise intensities are best for weight loss, and how much time should we spend performing each? To answer this question and maximize our fat burning potential, we need to learn about fuel utilization and the lactate threshold.

Fat Oxidation & Cardio Intensity

If you were to get on a treadmill, set the speed to 10 mph, and run for 15 minutes, you’d burn more calories per minute than if you set it to 6 mph for the same duration. After your 10 mph run, you’d be reduced to an exhausted, sweaty mess, but content with the effort because it burned a high number of calories. Unfortunately, that high-intensity cardio session you suffered through wasn’t ideal for fat loss.

In a laboratory setting, fat utilization is calculated by measuring the ratio of exhaled carbon dioxide to inhaled oxygen per breath. This measurement is the respiratory exchange ratio (RER). An RER of 1.0 indicates that 100% of fuel burned is from carbohydrates, a ratio of 0.7 is all fat, and 0.85 is an even mix of the two. As exercise intensity increases, we gradually shift from fat to carbs for energy. The 10 mph run from earlier burnt quite a few calories but it’s unlikely they were from stored fat.

After learning about RER and the relationship between exercise intensity and fat burn, you decide to change up your cardio tactics and try a different approach. The next day at the gym, you get back on the treadmill at an easy starting speed of 3 mph. A few minutes pass as you search for the right playlist on your phone, clear new notifications, and continue walking. After finding the right song, you get to work and increase the belt speed by 1 mph every two minutes until you reach 10 mph. You sustain this top speed of 10 mph for 30 seconds before stopping due to exhaustion.

How is this new cardio strategy different from the first run?

During the time it took you to find the perfect song, your body started producing lactate (a byproduct of anaerobic metabolism) and your RER rose as more stored carbohydrates were burned. Your RER probably never exceeded 0.85 during this time, meaning fat was your primary fuel source. With manageable lactate levels and a plentiful supply of stored aerobic energy (fat), your song selection walking pace could be sustained for hours without any difficulty. Lactate build up wasn’t a problem at this low level of exercise intensity because your body removed it at roughly the same rate it was produced.

Things changed as your speed increased. At some point between 3-10 mph (possibly around 7-8 mph), the manageable trickle of lactate turned into a flood and byproducts of anaerobic glycolysis (lactate, ammonia, and hydrogen ions) accumulated faster than they could be removed. RER grew significantly during this time and eventually reached 1.0, meaning nearly all energy was produced from the breakdown of carbohydrates. With metabolites built up in your muscles and the unlimited fuel supply for fat oxidation a thing of the past, you reached exercise failure a few minutes after crossing an invisible metabolic line. You were forced to stop running due to exhaustion.

The heart rate value associated with a sudden and exponential increase in lactate production during high-intensity exercise is the lactate threshold (LT). The lactate threshold is basically our upper limit of sustainable exercise. We can work for a really long time at heart rate intensities below LT, but once we exceed it and start to burn carbohydrates as a primary fuel source, the countdown timer to exhaustion begins.

So, how can we delay the transition from fat to carbohydrates and keep burning stored body fat as exercise intensity increases? The answer is high-intensity exercise.

Lactate thresholds vary from person to person due to differences in diet, training styles, conditioning levels, and genetics, but they can be modified through high-intensity exercise. Activity beyond LT burns a small amount of fat, but strategic implementation of high-intensity cardio can delay the onset of LT and shift lactate thresholds closer to our max heart rate. More room between our minimum heart rate and LT means we have a larger aerobic base and can expend more energy before reaching the carb burning RER zone of 1.0.

If we increase our LT through high-intensity exercise, we’ll have –

A larger aerobic heart rate range, resulting in more fat burned per minute at low to moderate exercise intensities.
A greater work capacity, providing faster recovery times from both resistance training and cardiovascular exercise.
An improved VO2max, leading to increased oxygen consumption and utilization. Better O2 usage means more fat oxidation during exercise and at rest.

All of these factors can help us lose weight significantly faster than diet alone. Plus, if you rely on a combination of diet and exercise for your weight loss progress instead of simply eating less, you’ll accidentally get into great cardiovascular shape as an added bonus.

Talking about metabolic thresholds and fuel utilization sure is fun, but it’s not that helpful if we don’t know how to apply these concepts practically. Let’s cover how to calculate LT and RER along with their specific applications to weight loss.

Accurately Determining LT & RER

The only truly accurate way to measure LT and RER is to have metabolic testing performed at either a local gym, hospital, or university. These tests are relatively short (1-2 hours) and not incredibly expensive ($150-400). If you have the ability to test, do it. The data provided is well worth the required time and financial cost of the assessment. This information will prove to be an invaluable asset to your weight loss programming.

If you don’t have access to a testing facility, don’t worry. We can still estimate LT and RER using two simple self-assessments. The information collected from these tests will not be as accurate as those performed in a carefully controlled professional setting, but can still be great data points for your cardio programming.

Estimating VT, LT, & RER

We now know that an increase in exercise intensity changes the gasses we exchange while breathing. The strong link between breathing, heart rate, oxidation of fats, and the anaerobic metabolism of carbohydrates allows us to estimate an RER of 0.85 (equal mix of fats and carbs for energy) and an RER of 1.0 (all carbs) with two simple tests. These two self-assessments are the ventilatory threshold (VT) and lactate threshold (LT) tests.

The heart rate values provided by VT and LT testing tell us what intensities to aim for during cardiovascular exercise. VT for aerobic cardio and LT for anaerobic. These metabolic points help us develop unique cardiovascular programs based on our individual needs, allowing us to target fat loss as efficiently as possible.

The first assessment is the ventilatory threshold test. As we increase exercise intensity, our ability to talk smoothly and without interruption decreases. For example, a conversation held while walking around the office with your coworker requires a very low level of physical exertion. You can walk and talk with no problem. However, if you two were to sprint for a few minutes outside in the parking lot, you’d be breathing so hard that getting out a single word would be nearly impossible. The ventilatory threshold test helps us find the midpoint between these two intensities and estimate an RER of 0.85. It measures observable changes in speech consistency to pinpoint specific metabolic changes and does not require maximum effort.

The goal of this assessment is to identify a steady state heart rate value where you can no longer talk comfortably or continuously during cardiovascular exercise. The marker for this test is speech that’s broken by large breaths every 3-5 words. You should be breathing harder than at rest, but the intensity should be sustainable for a very long time. The VT self-assessment should not be difficult to complete. You need a heart rate monitor and a treadmill to test your ventilatory threshold.

VT Self-Assessment

Record your resting heart rate.
Warm up with a walk or jog on the treadmill for five minutes at an intensity of roughly 4/10. Aim for an intensity difficult enough to cause a mild sweat.
After warming up, get off the treadmill and relax for a few minutes until your heart rate has recovered to its resting level.
Once recovered, start walking on the treadmill at 1.5 mph at an incline of 1%.
Increase the speed by 0.5 mph every two minutes.
During each two minute segment, recite any memorized paragraph that’s long enough for 20-30 seconds of continuous speaking. The Pledge of Allegiance is commonly used here. This oral section of the exam should begin roughly 90 seconds into all two minute periods.
Closely monitor your heart rate during each two minute section. Note the number every 30 seconds.
Continue to increase speed and recite your paragraph until you are no longer able to speak continuously due to breathing requirements. Record your heart rate. This is your estimated VT.
Return the treadmill speed to an easy walking speed and cool down for one minute.
Congratulations. You’ve completed the VT test.

Before reading about LT testing, please keep in mind that this assessment is optional for most people. It’s a tough test. LT heart rate data will greatly benefit your training, but it’s not absolutely necessary for fat loss success or for the workouts covered later. We’ll cover why this is optional in the Anaerobic Training section.

The LT test helps us identify a heart rate value associated with our lactate thresholds and an RER of 1.0. We test for LT by maintaining the highest possible level of cardiovascular intensity for 10 minutes. You need a heart rate monitor and a treadmill to test your lactate threshold.

LT Self-Assessment

Record your resting heart rate.
Warm up with a walk or jog on the treadmill for five minutes at an intensity of roughly 4/10. Aim for an intensity difficult enough to cause a mild sweat.
After warming up, get off the treadmill and relax for a few minutes until your heart rate has recovered to its resting level.
Get back on the treadmill and start walking at ~3.0 mph and an incline of 1%.
Increase speed until you have reached what you estimate to be the highest level of intensity you can sustain for 10 minutes. Adjusting the speed early is OK but should be left to a consistent speed for as much of the run as possible. Your speed should be set by minute 2-3 and it should be held for the entire test duration. It’s important that you settle into a steady heart rate zone as early as possible. If you are able to increase speed after minute six, your results will not be accurate. You should be completely exhausted after the nine minute mark. This test sucks and is not meant for new exercisers or severely deconditioned individuals.
Record your heart rate each minute during the last three minutes of the run. Use these three points to find your average heart rate. Multiply your average heart rate by 0.9. This is your estimated LT.
Return the treadmill speed to an easy walking speed and cool down for one minute.
Congratulations. You’ve completed the test for LT.

As you progress in conditioning, regular retesting is necessary. A great cardio program will improve your aerobic base, work capacity, lactate threshold, and fat burning capabilities. But if you never retest and consistently work below your optimal fat loss zones, changes in body composition will take much longer. The intensity of your fat loss cardio sessions should reflect your conditioning progress. The better shape you’re in, the higher your VT and LT will be. I suggest reassessments every 4-6 months for conditioned individuals, and every two months for the first six months for beginners.

Choose whichever assessment method is best for you, but please purchase a heart rate monitor for accurate data tracking. Whether it’s a nice watch with a digital display, or an IR light sensor band that connects to your phone through Bluetooth, get one.

Aerobic & Anaerobic Training For Fat Loss

Now that the potentially confusing part is behind us and we know our heart rate values, we can start programming for fat loss.

The overall concept here is pretty simple. We want to perform 1-2 hours of cardio per week. 80% of this time should be spent burning fat at VT (within 5-10 bpm of your target HR is fine), and the remaining 20% at or above LT through high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and/or lactate threshold training (LTT). This split allows us to maximize fat oxidation and increase our aerobic capacity. Thanks to a few pretty cool physiological adaptations, we can essentially train our bodies to clearly recognize which exercise conditions should burn fat for fuel versus those that should rely on carbohydrates.

To understand why this 80/20 split matters, let’s first discuss the aerobic side of things.

Aerobic conditioning directly targets fat loss through low-intensity, steady state (LISS) cardio. That’s primarily why we want to spend most of our time in this zone. But it also translates into increased oxidation efficiency during subsequent, non-cardio activities. Meaning, we get better at using stored body fat for energy when we’re mowing the yard, walking around the store, etc.

Regularly engaging in cardiovascular exercise teaches our type 1 muscle fibers how to be better at oxidizing fat. This is done by stimulating protein synthesis and increasing mitochondrial density. With more mitochondrial content in our muscles to metabolize fat, we also benefit from elevated post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC). A higher EPOC means we burn more fat while at rest after a workout. All of these factors contribute to faster fat loss.

Because we know fat utilization decreases as exercise intensity increases, working as close to VT as possible during longer aerobic sessions is key. The heart rate value VT gives us a great compromise between maximum calorie burn per minute and peak fat utilization. This intensity level is also easy enough to be repeated multiple times throughout the week with minimal risk of CNS fatigue accumulation if sessions are capped at 20-30 minutes (not including resistance work) and limited to 4-5 days a week. Do your best to stick to these upper limits to avoid unnecessary strength and hypertrophy losses.

I recommend running and walking for the majority of your aerobic exercise. Most of us spend a ton of time indoors with work. Go outside if possible. Along with the potentially therapeutic scenery, propelling yourself forward with natural movement can be more effective than using a stationary machine due to the additional physical requirements. When we run outside, our bodies must continuously propel themselves forward (greater energy demand than on a treadmill) and use core musculature to remain upright (better posture and balance). There are no rails to lean on or belts to keep you moving as you walk through your neighborhood. You do the work. If you have the ability to be outdoors, do it. The aerobic exercise you choose should be one you enjoy and are able to repeat consistently. Stick to your target heart rate and do what’s best for you.

On the other side of the intensity spectrum, anaerobic workouts increase our lactate thresholds and give us a larger aerobic window to burn fat. By training the body to adapt to high-intensity exercise and delay the onset of lactate production, our heart rate value for VT increases. This shift in metabolic efficiency means our new VT still registers an RER of 0.85, but the total caloric burn per minute from fat has increased.

In the examples listed on the next page, you can see this concept illustrated in trained versus untrained individuals.

If the untrained person’s VT is 110 bpm and the trained exerciser has a VT of 130 bpm, it’s easy to see who can drop weight faster based on their individual metabolic targets. While both people will eventually reach their weight loss goals, the trained person is able to work harder and burn more fat calories per minute than the untrained (higher trained BPM but same RER). Training at and above our LT with high-intensity exercise improves our fat utilization capabilities at higher heart rates and results in faster weight loss during subsequent aerobic sessions.

Unlike aerobic exercise, anaerobic sessions should focus on short intervals lasting 0.5-4 minutes per set. These sets should utilize a 1:1-1:4 work to rest ratio, depending on segment intensity and individual conditioning levels. High speed running intervals are great for HIIT/LTT, but may not be ideal for some. Other modalities like cycling, kettlebell swings, burpees, air bikes, and rowers can be just as effective. Perform these in isolation or combine a few of your favorites into a circuit. As long as your heart rate stays at or above LT for the required time, feel free to experiment with different styles. Limit HIIT/LTT workouts to 3-4 times per week.

As mentioned earlier in the LT testing section, lactate threshold heart rate data is not absolutely necessary for success. You can estimate the workload needed. If an interval is two minutes long, you should be working at an intensity of at least 7/10 for the entire segment. Appropriate LT training intensities should be difficult and leave you spent at the end of each round. It may take a few workouts to accurately assess your limitations and capabilities. To be safe, start on the easier side of things and work your way up as you feel more comfortable and confident with new exercises. These sets should be pretty tough, but they’re also relatively short and only take up 20% of our total weekly cardio time. Work hard. Recover. Repeat.

Resistance Training & Weight Loss Examples

A quality fat loss cardio program is one that supplements an existing resistance training routine. Research shows that resistance training alone is an ineffective fat loss method, but lifting heavy things frequently does help maintain muscle mass that would normally be lost while on a weight-loss diet. Because of this, your weight training program should not indicate that you’re trying to lose weight. If you’re interested in being strong, focus on strength training. Follow a great hypertrophy plan if aesthetics are your thing. Lift to improve some aspect of resistance training, but don’t attempt to burn fat with high-rep and low-load sets. We want to maintain as much lean mass and strength as possible as the pounds drop. A good weight training routine is the most effective strategy for this. Lifting before a cardio session can also deplete glycogen stores, making fat loss focused cardiovascular exercise even more effective.

For novice lifters, it is entirely possible to lose fat, gain muscle, and increase strength at the same time. However, this concurrent progress will fade as you adapt to the demands of your new lifestyle. Depending on the timeline of your goals, it may be a great idea to take advantage of beginner gains and tackle all three aspects of fitness at once. Alternatively, you may want to simplify things and begin with only resistance training, then incorporate fat loss at a later time. Do what’s best for you.

For experienced lifters, it’s likely that slowed progress or some regression in size and strength will occur due to the negative (350-700 kcal/day) daily caloric balance and overall catabolic stress on the body. But because you aren’t crash dieting and are taking a smart approach to weight loss, don’t worry about it. Your weight loss period is temporary and you’ll catch back up leaner than before with a greater aerobic base.

Two example weeks that vary in style and total time are listed on the next page and should help with program design. Both examples take advantage of three different cardio styles, and target both aerobic and anaerobic energy systems. These three styles are –

LISS
Low-intensity steady state

HIIT
High-intensity interval training

LHS
Low/high-intensity splits

The cardiovascular conditioning time structure for all Fitstra programs is read as –

Number of rounds [Aerobic (VT) minutes > Anaerobic (LT) minutes]

Using 1 [2 min > 1 min] as an example, one complete round of cardio is performed. The round contains a single, two minute aerobic bout that is immediately followed by a one minute high-intensity segment. The entire round totals three minutes of work.

4 [2 min > 1 min] is a two minute aerobic bout followed by a one minute high-intensity segment, performed for four rounds. This example totals 12 minutes.

In the first example listed above, four days of weights are combined with five days fat loss cardio. This week contains 98 minutes of aerobic activity and 22 minutes of anaerobic work, totaling 120 minutes. Monday begins with an alternating aerobic-to-anaerobic LHS style of cardio, Tuesday is pure HIIT, Wednesday and Thursday are both low-intensity steady state days, and Friday wraps things up with one last LHS workout. This more advanced schedule might not be feasible for some people due to the time commitment and total volume of work, but the format can easily be modified.

The second example follows a two day resistance split that is combined with five supplemental days of weight loss cardio, totaling 90 minutes. Like the 120 minute example, all three (LHS, LISS, & HIIT) styles of cardio are used here. The week kicks off with some LHS work on Monday, is pure aerobic LISS on Tuesday/Wednesday, HIIT on Thursday, and LHS on Friday. This specific example has 74 minutes of aerobic cardio and 16 minutes of anaerobic. Both weeks require an investment of time, but the strategy is pretty straightforward and doable for most people.
These simple outlines should help illustrate how easy it can be to incorporate effective cardiovascular exercise and resistance training into your week without spending hours in the gym. Like nearly every other aspect of fitness, there’s more than one way to approach this problem. Use the time, ratio, and frequency guidelines covered here as models to help build what’s best for you.

Strength & Hypertrophy Work Capacity

This chapter is all about weight loss, but a great cardio program does not exclusively benefit those seeking a change in body composition. Within the context of resistance training, aerobic and anaerobic cardio give us one major advantage over those who skip it. A greater work capacity.

Work capacity is the amount of exercise volume we can complete in a set amount of time (per set or per day) and how quickly we can recover from it. The different styles of cardiovascular exercise covered in this chapter stimulate mitochondrial protein synthesis which can increase our work capacity. An increase in muscular mitochondrial density means our ability to store, produce, and break down energy (ATP, creatine phosphate, & glycogen) is increased, the efficiency of all three energy systems (ATP-CP, glycolytic, and aerobic) is improved, and recovery time between sets/workouts is decreased. More muscular energy and quicker activity turnaround times result in faster muscle growth and greater strength gains.

If you have no interest in weight loss but want to maximize gains, you still need to be doing some amount of cardio. Keep the 80/20 percentage, cap the total max time to about one hour per week, and limit most cardio to lifting days. The example above follows these modifications for a total of 44 (36+8) minutes. Simple, effective, and easily variable. Train however you like, but emphasize cardiovascular health. No program is truly complete without it.

Final Thoughts

While there are a number of variables that contribute to weight loss, a smart cardio program should be our top exercise priority. By using a few key metabolic markers, we can easily design plans that supplement just about any weight training routine. When those plans are combined with healthy nutrition habits and smart resistance training, the pounds will drop. Weight loss is hard when you eat poorly and workout without structure. Make it easy.

Establish appropriate expectations for yourself by setting goals based on realistic timelines and your own dietary habits. Do your best to keep weight loss from turning into an obsession that controls your life. Small (1% or less) weekly reductions in total body weight can seem insignificant week to week, but they add up fast.

Work hard, stay consistent, and be sure to take the time to celebrate every small victory you experience throughout your weight loss journey.

Experiment by manipulating different variables. Find what works best for you. Share what you discover. Have fun.

References

Achten, J., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2004). Optimizing fat oxidation through exercise and diet. Nutrition, 20(7-8), 716–727.

Agarwal S. K. (2012). Cardiovascular benefits of exercise. International journal of general medicine, 5, 541-5.

Brun, Jean & Malatesta, Davide & Sartorio, Alessandro. (2012). Maximal lipid oxidation during exercise: A target for individualizing endurance training in obesity and diabetes?. Journal of endocrinological investigation. 35. 686-91. 10.3275/8466.

Bryant, C. X., & Green, D. J. (2010). ACE personal trainer manual: The ultimate resource for fitness professionals. San Diego, CA: American Council on Exercise.

Boutcher, S. H. (2011). High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise and Fat Loss. Journal of Obesity, 2011, 1-10.

Cadore, E. L., Pinto, R. S., Bottaro, M., & Izquierdo, M. (2014). Strength and endurance training prescription in healthy and frail elderly. Aging and disease, 5(3), 183-95. doi:10.14336/AD.2014.0500183

Deyhle, M., Mermier, C., & Kravitz, L. (n.d.). The Physiology of Fat Loss. Retrieved January 22, 2019, from https://www.unm.edu/~lkravitz/Article folder/physiologgfatloss.html

Diefenthaeler, Fernando, Sakugawa, Raphael Luiz, Dellagrana, Rodolfo André, Follmer, Bruno, Lemos, Elisa Cristina, & Campos, Wagner de. (2017). Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano, 19(1), 108-117

DONNELLY, J. E., BLAIR, S. N., JAKICIC, J. M., MANORE, M. M., RANKIN, J. W., & SMITH, B. K. (2009). Appropriate Physical Activity Intervention Strategies for Weight Loss and Prevention of Weight Regain for Adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(2), 459–471.

DWYER, J., & BYBEE, R. (1983). Heart rate indices of the anaerobic threshold. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 15(1), 72-76.

Dyck, D. J., Miskovic, D., Code, L., Luiken, J. J., & Bonen, A. (2000). Endurance training increases FFA oxidation and reduces triacylglycerol utilization in contracting rat soleus. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 278(5).

Ekkekakis, P., & Lind, E. (2005). Exercise does not feel the same when you are overweight: the impact of self-selected and imposed intensity on affect and exertion. International Journal of Obesity, 30(4), 652–660.

Fyfe, J. J., Bishop, D. J., & Stepto, N. K. (2014). Interference between Concurrent Resistance and Endurance Exercise: Molecular Bases and the Role of Individual Training Variables. Sports Medicine, 44(6), 743–762.

Garrow, J.S. & Summerbell, C. (1995). Meta-analysis: Effect of exercise, with or without dieting, on the body composition of overweight subjects. European journal of clinical nutrition. 49. 1-10.

Gibala, M. (2009). Molecular responses to high-intensity interval exercise. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 34(3), 428-432.

Ghosh A. K. (2004). Anaerobic threshold: its concept and role in endurance sport. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 11(1), 24-36.

HAGAN, R. D., UPTON, S. J., WONG, L., & WHITTAM, J. (1986). The effects of aerobic conditioning and/or caloric restriction in overweight men and women. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 18(1), 87-94.

Halvarsson, A., Dohrn, I. M., & Ståhle, A. (2015). Taking balance training for older adults one step further: the rationale for and a description of a proven balance training programme. Clinical rehabilitation, 29(5), 417-25.

Hultman, E. (1995). Fuel selection, muscle fibre. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 54(01), 107–121.

Jakicic, J. M., & Otto, A. D. (2005). Physical activity considerations for the treatment and prevention of obesity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 82(1), 226S–229S.

Jakicic, J. M. (2008). Effect of Exercise on 24-Month Weight Loss Maintenance in Overweight Women. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(14), 1550.

Karapetian, G., Engels, H., & Gretebeck, R. (2008). Use of Heart Rate Variability to Estimate LT and VT. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 29(08), 652–657.

Karp, J. (2009, Feb 01). The Three Metabolic Energy Systems. Retrieved from https://www.ideafit.com/fitness-library/the-three-metabolic-energy-systems

Kjertakov, M., Dalip, M., Hristovski, R., & Epstein, Y. (2016). Prediction of lactate threshold using the modified Conconi test in distance runners. Acta Physiologica Hungarica, 103(2), 262-270.

Koutlianos, N., Dimitros, E., Metaxas, T., Cansiz, M., Deligiannis, A., & Kouidi, E. (2013). Indirect estimation of VO2max in athletes by ACSM’s equation: valid or not?. Hippokratia, 17(2), 136-40.

Laforgia, J., Withers, R. T., & Gore, C. J. (2006). Effects of exercise intensity and duration on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(12), 1247–1264.

Lazzer, S., Lafortuna, C., Busti, C., Galli, R., Agosti, F., & Sartorio, A. (2011). Effects of low- and high-intensity exercise training on body composition and substrate metabolism in obese adolescents. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 34(1), 45-52.

Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL, et al. Molecular Cell Biology. 4th edition. New York: W. H. Freeman; 2000. Section 16.1, Oxidation of Glucose and Fatty Acids to CO2. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21624/

Nutrition and Athletic Performance. (2016). Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(3), 543–568.

Mcgehee, J. C., Tanner, C. J., & Houmard, J. A. (2005). A Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Lactate Threshold. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(3), 553.

Meerman Ruben, Brown Andrew J. When somebody loses weight, where does the fat go? BMJ 2014; 349 :g7257

Methenitis S. (2018). A Brief Review on Concurrent Training: From Laboratory to the Field. Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 6(4), 127.

Mike, J. N., & Kravitz, L. (n.d.). Recovery in Training: The Essential Ingredient. Retrieved from https://www.unm.edu/~lkravitz/Article folder/recoveryUNM.html

Mooses, M., Tippi, B., Mooses, K., Durussel, J., & Mäestu, J. (2015). Better economy in field running than on the treadmill: evidence from high-level distance runners. Biology of sport, 32(2), 155-9.

Nieman, D. (2008). Inactivity, exercise training and detraining, and plasma lipoproteins. STRRIDE: A randomized, controlled study of exercise intensity and amount. Yearbook of Sports Medicine, 2008, 133-134.

Patel, H., Alkhawam, H., Madanieh, R., Shah, N., Kosmas, C. E., & Vittorio, T. J. (2017). Aerobic vs anaerobic exercise training effects on the cardiovascular system. World journal of cardiology, 9(2), 134-138.

Péronnet, François & Massicotte, D. (1991). Péronnet F, Massicotte DTable of nonprotein respiratory quotient: an update. Can J Sport Sci 16:23-29. Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport. 16. 23-9.

Pinet, B. M., Prud’homme, D., Gallant, C. A., & Boulay, P. (2008). Exercise Intensity Prescription in Obese Individuals. Obesity, 16(9), 2088–2095.

Ramos-Jiménez, A., Hernández-Torres, R. P., Torres-Durán, P. V., Romero-Gonzalez, J., Mascher, D., Posadas-Romero, C., & Juárez-Oropeza, M. A. (2008). The Respiratory Exchange Ratio is Associated with Fitness Indicators Both in Trained and Untrained Men: A Possible Application for People with Reduced Exercise Tolerance. Clinical medicine. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine, 2, 1-9.

Robinson, S. L., Hattersley, J., Frost, G. S., Chambers, E. S., & Wallis, G. A. (2015). Maximal fat oxidation during exercise is positively associated with 24-hour fat oxidation and insulin sensitivity in young, healthy men. Journal of Applied Physiology, 118(11), 1415–1422.

Said, M. A., Abdelmoneem, M., Almaqhawi, A., Hamid Kotob, A. A., Alibrahim, M. C., & Bougmiza, I. (2018). Multidisciplinary approach to obesity: Aerobic or resistance physical exercise? Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness.

Saunders, P. U., Pyne, D. B., Telford, R. D., & Hawley, J. A. (2004). Factors Affecting Running Economy in Trained Distance Runners. Sports Medicine, 34(7), 465–485.

Schaar, B., Moos-Thiele, C., & Platen, P. (2010). Effects of Exercise, Diet, and a Combination of Exercise and Diet in Overweight and Obese Adults – A Meta-Analysis of the Data. The Open Sports Medicine Journal, 4(1), 17-28.

Schoenfeld, B., & Dawes, J. (2009). High-Intensity Interval Training: Applications for General Fitness Training. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 31(6), 44–46.

Solberg, G., Robstad, B., Skjønsberg, O. H., & Borchsenius, F. (2005). Respiratory gas exchange indices for estimating the anaerobic threshold. Journal of sports science & medicine, 4(1), 29-36.

Stryer, Lubert (1995). Biochemistry (Fourth ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. pp. 510–515, 581–613, 775–778. ISBN 0 7167 2009 4.

Talanian, J. L., Galloway, S. D. R., Heigenhauser, G. J. F., Bonen, A., & Spriet, L. L. (2007). Two weeks of high-intensity aerobic interval training increases the capacity for fat oxidation during exercise in women. Journal of Applied Physiology, 102(4), 1439–1447.

Thomas, K., Brownstein, C. G., Dent, J., Parker, P., Goodall, S., & Howatson, G. (2018). Neuromuscular Fatigue and Recovery after Heavy Resistance, Jump, and Sprint Training. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1.

THOMAS, K., GOODALL, S., STONE, M., HOWATSON, G., GIBSON, A. S. C., & ANSLEY, L. (2015). Central and Peripheral Fatigue in Male Cyclists after 4-, 20-, and 40-km Time Trials. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47(3), 537–546.

Tremblay, A., Simoneau, J.-A., & Bouchard, C. (1994). Impact of exercise intensity on body fatness and skeletal muscle metabolism. Metabolism, 43(7), 814–818.

van Wessel, T., de Haan, A., van der Laarse, W. J., & Jaspers, R. T. (2010). The muscle fiber type-fiber size paradox: hypertrophy or oxidative metabolism?. European journal of applied physiology, 110(4), 665-94.

Wang, Y., & Xu, D. (2017). Effects of aerobic exercise on lipids and lipoproteins. Lipids in health and disease, 16(1), 132.

Willis, L. H., Slentz, C. A., Bateman, L. A., Shields, A. T., Piner, L. W., Bales, C. W., … Kraus, W. E. (2012). Effects of aerobic and/or resistance training on body mass and fat mass in overweight or obese adults. Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(12), 1831–1837.

Zuhl, M., & Kravitz, L. (n.d.). HIIT vs Continuous Endurance Training: Battle of the Aerobic Titans. Retrieved from https://www.unm.edu/~lkravitz/Article folder/HIITvsCardio.html

The post Cardio: Fat Loss & Work Capacity appeared first on Fitstra.